This article about a recent experiment was just published the other day: http://phys.org/news/2015-02-hindsight-foresight-accurately-quantum-state.html(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

I can't help but think that this is at least weak evidence in favour of the retrocausal interpretation. Of course other interpretations aren't falsified by this, but how would for instance Bohm Or Everett account for this result?

**Physics Forums | Science Articles, Homework Help, Discussion**

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Evidence for retrocausal interpretation of QM?

Loading...

Similar Threads for Evidence retrocausal interpretation |
---|

A Does the Frauchiger-Renner Theorem prove only MWI is correct |

I Correlation setup between past and present |

A Is there a local interpretation of Reeh-Schlieder theorem? |

I Retrocausality or not .... |

I A new approach: retrocausality in QFT |

**Physics Forums | Science Articles, Homework Help, Discussion**