Exact Value of 6561(1/ln(9)) Using Logarithmic Form

  • Thread starter Thread starter imull
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around finding the exact value of the expression 6561(1/ln(9)), with a focus on logarithmic forms and potential simplifications. The subject area includes logarithms and their properties.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Conceptual clarification

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to convert the expression into logarithmic form but expresses uncertainty about the next steps. Participants suggest exploring different bases and factoring 6561 to gain further insights.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants providing suggestions for alternative approaches and expressing curiosity about the original poster's method. There is acknowledgment of the exact value already present in the expression, and some guidance has been offered regarding potential simplifications.

Contextual Notes

Participants are considering the implications of the logarithmic form and whether the base of the logarithm might need to be adjusted. There is also a suggestion to factor 6561, indicating a possible avenue for exploration.

imull
Messages
40
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Find the exact value of the expression: 6561(1/ln(9))

Homework Equations


logax=(1/ln(a))(ln(x))

The Attempt at a Solution


I thought that I would start it by putting the expression into logarithmic form: log6561x=1/(ln(9)). I am not sure where to go from here though.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Try a different base.
 
Such as?
 
imull said:
Such as?

You already have an exact value. It's just what's printed there. You can express it in other ways that don't look terribly much simpler. I suspect that the log in the exponent might be intended to be a different base. Is that the exact problem? Try factoring 6561 to see why I might think so.
 
Last edited:
Dick said:
You already have an exact value. It's just what's printed there.
Exactly.

You can express it in other ways that don't look terribly much simpler.
It can be expressed in a much more compact form than 6561(1/ln 9).

Try factoring 6561 to see why I might think so.
That's a very good suggestion.
 
Thank you both very much. I'll work on it.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
32
Views
3K