Example 7-10 Lagrangian Dynamics Marion and Thornton

  • #1
MARX
49
1

Homework Statement


A particle of mass m is on top of a frictionless hemisphere centered at the origin with radius a"
Set up the lagrange equatinos determine the constraint force and the point at which the particle detaches from the hemisphere

Homework Equations


L=T-U

The Attempt at a Solution


this is NOT HW
solution is there in full (example from book) I am just trying to understand
why is φ not one of the proper generalized coordinates? can't the particle move sideways as well when released? shouldn't the GC be (r,θ,φ) ie all spherical and the constraint equation r-a=0.
THanks
 

Answers and Replies

  • #2
BvU
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
15,267
4,244
What would the Euler-Lagrange equations give you for ##\phi## ?
 
  • #3
MARX
49
1
(sin(2φ)/2)*(dθ/dt)-(d^2/dt^2)(φ)=0
I though of integrating it but θ is also dependent on t
 
Last edited:
  • #4
MARX
49
1
even if I replace dθ/dt from what I get from euler-L of θ I would still get cosθ in the above equation!
 
  • #5
BvU
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
15,267
4,244
(Sorry for the late reaction) ##\quad##I find, with $$ \ T = {1\over 2} m\dot r^2+r^2\dot\theta^2+r^2\sin^2\theta\,\dot\phi^2 \ $$ (here, top of p7) and $$V = -mr\cos\theta\ $$ that $$ {\partial {\mathcal L}\over \partial \phi} = 0 $$ so that $${ d\over dt } 2r^2 \sin^2\theta\,\dot\phi = 0 \ ,$$in other words: ##L_z=## constant (##L## being the angular momentum). The particle is let go with ##L_z=0## so it stays at that value.
 
  • #6
MARX
49
1
yes absolutely simple one line answer
forgive my stupidity I copied the T term from Wolfram Alpha and there they use θ for φ and vice vera- (I was too lazy to do this trivial math considering I'm a fanatic I solve every single example and problem in every chapter)
damn mathematicians-lol(kidding love them)
that explains why my differential equation above gets complicated and doesn't reveal conservation
I completely get it the angular momentum does not change in that direction
Lz is explicitly determined and happens to be a constant multiple of the euler-Lagrangian variation and that's why it never moves sideways I get it supports intuition in this case
Thank you so much for your help and clarification appreciated A+++++++
 
  • #7
BvU
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
15,267
4,244
OK, on to the next ...
 
  • #8
MARX
49
1
Sure
I am on problem 7-20 so far able to solve them all
actually I do have a question (clarification) on problem 7-10 should I post here or different thread
THanks
 

Suggested for: Example 7-10 Lagrangian Dynamics Marion and Thornton

Replies
4
Views
754
Replies
15
Views
741
Replies
5
Views
348
  • Last Post
Replies
1
Views
497
  • Last Post
Replies
2
Views
133
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
26
Views
690
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
799
Replies
8
Views
2K
Top