Example of a differentiable structure on R

In summary, the manifold of the real-line R can have a differentiable structure generated by the map x^3. However, the inverse map is not smooth at x=0. This means that for points like x=0, different charts centered at other points besides x^3=0 must be taken. The smooth structure generated by x^3 is different from the smooth structure generated by x. To determine if two smooth atlases generate the same smooth structure, it is only necessary to check if all the charts are smoothly compatible.
  • #1
mordechai9
205
0
Consider the manifold of the real-line R with a differentiable structure generated by the map [tex] x^3 : M \rightarrow \mathbb{R} [/tex]. This example is given in a textbook I'm looking at, but I don't really understand how this can work. The inverse map is clearly not smooth at x=0.

Do they mean that at points like x=0 you have to take different charts, centered at other points besides x^3=0 in the image or something?

(Edited to say smooth instead of continuous.)
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Why do you think x^{1/3} not continuous at x=0? As x approaches from the right, x^{1/3} goes to 0, and as x approaches from the left, x^{1/3} goes to 0.

But maybe that was a typo and you meant that the derivative of x^{1/3} is not defined at x=0? That is true, and it is not a problem; it only means that the smooth structure x-->x^{1/3} on R is a different one from the smooth structure x-->x.
 
  • #3
Ah yea, sorry, I meant to say *smooth*, not continuous.

Regarding your answer -- I don't understand, or maybe I am not understanding what it means for this map to "generate" the differentiable structure. As I understand it, this map x^3 will act just like a chart; so therefore it must be a smooth homeomorphism -- but then that is clearly not true, like we've discussed. What do you mean that the smooth structure is just different? Thanks--
 
  • #4
Ok, say you have a topological manifold M. That is, a space locally homeomorphic to R^n, Hausdorff, 2nd countable and whatnot. Then a smooth atlas on that topological manifold is a choice of charts of M that are smoothly compatible: that is, charts such that the transition functions between those charts are diffeomorphisms (smooth with smooth inverse). Now a smooth structure on M is a maximal smooth atlas: that is, a smooth atlas A such that if you try to add any chart of M that is not already in A, then there will be some chart of A with which is will not be smoothly compatible.

And of course any smooth atlas for M is contained in a unique smooth structure: such add all the charts that are smoothly compatible with each other and with those of A. Thus, if an atlas A is contained in a smooth structure S, then A is said to generate S.

Note that to tell whether or not two smooth atlases A, A' generate the same smooth structure, we just have to check wheter or not all the charts of A are smoothly compatible with all the charts of A'.

So! What we have here is 2 atlases for the manifold M=R: A={f:R-->R: x-->x} and A'={g:R-->R:x-->x³}. In particular, they are both smooth atlases since the smooth compatibility conditions is trivially satisfied since both atlases are only made of one silly chart! To check wheter or not A and A' determine the smooth structure, we then have to verify that the transition functions g o f^{-1}(x) = x³ and f o g^{-1}(x)=x^{1/3} are smooth. The first is, but the second is not, as you noted.
 
  • #5
OK, thank you for that review. For my own edification I will make a few comments or remarks now. I thought that a chart just had to be smooth -- I didn't realize that we actually only require the weaker condition that the chart only needs to be smoothly compatible.

Also, I suspected that the atlas generated by the map x^3 would have more charts than just x^3 in the atlas. For example, take a new map [tex] x': M \rightarrow \mathbb{R} [/tex] which is just a translation of the old mapping, defined by [tex] x' = x^3 + p [/tex], where [tex] p \in \mathbb{R} [/tex]. It looks like this chart is smoothly compatible with x^-1, since [tex] x^{-1} \circ x' = (x^3 + p)^{1/3} [/tex] is differentiable everywhere. Also the other direction [tex] x'^{-1} \circ x = (x^3 - p)^{1/3} [/tex] looks to be differentiable at all points in M.

I thought that we would need to check the smoothness of all these maps generated by x but I guess that's not necessary, you just only allow the charts in the atlas to be exactly the ones that are smoothly compatible with the original chart.
 
  • #6
mordechai9 said:
OK, thank you for that review. For my own edification I will make a few comments or remarks now. I thought that a chart just had to be smooth -- I didn't realize that we actually only require the weaker condition that the chart only needs to be smoothly compatible.

Actually, it does not make sense in a general topological manifold M to speak of the smoothness of a chart U-->R^n. Differentiability is something that makes sense for maps between normed vector spaces.

mordechai9 said:
Also, I suspected that the atlas generated by the map x^3 would have more charts than just x^3 in the atlas. For example, take a new map [tex] x': M \rightarrow \mathbb{R} [/tex] which is just a translation of the old mapping, defined by [tex] x' = x^3 + p [/tex], where [tex] p \in \mathbb{R} [/tex]. It looks like this chart is smoothly compatible with x^-1, since [tex] x^{-1} \circ x' = (x^3 + p)^{1/3} [/tex] is differentiable everywhere. Also the other direction [tex] x'^{-1} \circ x = (x^3 - p)^{1/3} [/tex] looks to be differentiable at all points in M.

Call [itex]\phi:\mathbb{R}\rightarrow\mathbb{R}:x\mapsto x^3[/itex] and [itex]\psi:\mathbb{R}\rightarrow\mathbb{R}:x\mapsto x^3+p[/itex]. To check that these charts are smoothly compatible, you must check that [itex]\psi\circ\phi^{-1}:x\mapsto x+p[/itex] and [itex]\phi\circ\psi^{-1}:x\mapsto x-p[/itex] are smooth. Note that that you wrote the opposite: you checked that [itex]\psi^{-1}\circ\phi[/itex] and [itex]\phi^{-1}\circ\psi[/itex] are smooth (which they are not by the way; there is a problem at x=±p^{1/3}.)
 

What is a differentiable structure?

A differentiable structure is a mathematical concept used in differential geometry and calculus. It refers to the set of functions and their derivatives that can be defined on a given space, such as the real numbers. Essentially, it allows for smooth, continuous changes to be made on a space.

Why is it important to have a differentiable structure on R?

A differentiable structure on R allows for the use of differential calculus, which is essential in many areas of mathematics and science. It also allows for the study of smooth and continuous functions, which are often used to model real-world phenomena.

How is a differentiable structure defined on R?

A differentiable structure on R is defined by a collection of open sets and a set of functions, known as a coordinate system, that map these open sets to the real numbers. These functions must be smooth and satisfy certain compatibility conditions to form a differentiable structure.

Are there other differentiable structures on R besides the standard one?

Yes, there are infinitely many differentiable structures that can be defined on R. These are known as exotic differentiable structures and they have different properties than the standard one. However, they are all equivalent in the sense that they give rise to the same smooth functions and derivatives.

What are some applications of differentiable structures on R?

Differentiable structures on R have many applications in various fields of mathematics and science. They are used in differential geometry, dynamical systems, and physics, among others. In particular, they are essential in the study of smooth manifolds, which are spaces that locally resemble Euclidean space.

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
2K
  • Differential Geometry
Replies
10
Views
710
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • Differential Geometry
Replies
21
Views
644
  • Differential Geometry
Replies
21
Views
2K
  • Differential Geometry
Replies
2
Views
588
Replies
0
Views
314
  • Differential Geometry
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • Differential Geometry
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
354
Back
Top