Exceeding the saturation temperature of coolant on the clad for PWR

AI Thread Summary
In a thermal calculation of a KLT-40S reactor's fuel assembly, cladding temperatures were found to exceed coolant saturation temperatures by 30-60 degrees, particularly at the center of the fuel rod's height, raising concerns about potential boiling. It is permissible for PWR reactors to experience some nucleate boiling, with German plants routinely allowing it, while US plants typically avoid it to prevent high oxide thicknesses. Departure from Nucleate Boiling (DNB) is discouraged as it can damage fuel and weaken cladding. Achieving nucleate boiling requires the wall temperature to exceed the saturation temperature by a certain margin, and various correlations exist for calculating this threshold. Understanding these correlations and their applicability to specific pressure ranges is crucial for accurate thermal analysis.
nuclearsneke
Messages
15
Reaction score
5
TL;DR Summary
tl;dr: is it likely for cladding temperautre to exceed the coolant saturation temperature in PWR reactor?
Hello there.

I have been conducting a thermal calculation of a fuel assembly for KLT-40S reactor (a small modular PWR-like reactor installed at the floating nuclear power plant "Akademik Lomonosov" with electric power of 35 MWe.) and obtained some interesting results. It seems that cladding temperature exceeds the saturation temperature of coolant by 30-60 degrees and it happens mostly in the center of the fuel rod's height.
I believe it could lead to boiling of coolant in these zones. But questions is: is it allowable for PWR reactor core to have some axial zones with boiling? And am I right about this case of boiling?

If you provided to your point of view some sources to refference at, it would be also a great piece of help. Thanks in advance.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
nuclearsneke said:
Summary: tl;dr: is it likely for cladding temperautre to exceed the coolant saturation temperature in PWR reactor?

But questions is: is it allowable for PWR reactor core to have some axial zones with boiling? And am I right about this case of boiling?
It is permissible to have nucleate boiling in a PWR core, and some German plants have done so routinely. Some US plants may have some nucleate boiling, probably on the order of a few percent, and in the upper spans of the core. However, in general, to preclude high oxide thicknesses, most PWRs try to avoid nucleate boiling.

Edit/update - Departure from Nucleate Boiling (DNB) is strongly discouraged. DNB would damage the fuel, or otherwise, weaken the cladding.
 
Last edited:
There is some nucleate boiling (also called subcooled boiling) in most (if not all) PWR reactors. There isn't a lot, but it is present.

Having a wall temperature greater than the saturation temperature does not guarantee you will have nucleate boiling. The wall temperature has to be greater than the saturation temperature by some amount.

There are several correlations that can be used to calculate the wall temperature (Twall) that will produce nucleate boiling. These correlations include Jens-Lotte, Thom, and Chen. I did a quick search and came up with this webpage that shows the Thom and Chen correlations:

https://www.thermal-engineering.org/what-is-nucleate-boiling-definition/

Note that the different correlations will give different results, and sometimes the differences are significant. I suggest looking in multiple textbooks and making sure the correlations are valid over the pressure ranges you will be applying them.
 
  • Like
Likes nuclearsneke and Astronuc
Hello everyone, I am currently working on a burnup calculation for a fuel assembly with repeated geometric structures using MCNP6. I have defined two materials (Material 1 and Material 2) which are actually the same material but located in different positions. However, after running the calculation with the BURN card, I am encountering an issue where all burnup information(power fraction(Initial input is 1,but output file is 0), burnup, mass, etc.) for Material 2 is zero, while Material 1...
Hi everyone, I'm a complete beginner with MCNP and trying to learn how to perform burnup calculations. Right now, I'm feeling a bit lost and not sure where to start. I found the OECD-NEA Burnup Credit Calculational Criticality Benchmark (Phase I-B) and was wondering if anyone has worked through this specific benchmark using MCNP6? If so, would you be willing to share your MCNP input file for it? Seeing an actual working example would be incredibly helpful for my learning. I'd be really...
Back
Top