Existance of time before big bang

  • Thread starter Thread starter dhruv mishra
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Big bang Time
Click For Summary
The discussion centers on whether time existed before the Big Bang and the implications of such a concept. Participants argue that any description of "before" the Big Bang is speculative, as current scientific models do not adequately explain conditions at t=0 or what preceded it. Some propose that time could potentially move in two directions, while others assert that time only progresses forward, supported by the "arrow of time" principle. The conversation also touches on the nature of causality and the limitations of our understanding of the universe, emphasizing that many aspects of time and existence remain poorly defined. Overall, the debate highlights the complexities and uncertainties surrounding the origins of time and the universe itself.
  • #31
Travis_King said:
Agreed. And as you stated, before the big bang, all current theories break down. There is no math to describe what happened at this state. And no one has any evidence against anything existing prior to the big bang or even at time zero, so really what can we hope for in the way of maths and evidence in a topic such as this? Does that mean we shut it down? Many of the great discoveries in this field were, while substantiated with math, initially nothing but conjecture and speculation. Speculation is not always senseless.

Speculation without knowledge of the field or accurate data to describe anything is both pointless and against forum rules, speculating explanations must be based on something. As far as I am concerned the OP was answered; current physics cannot say what, if anything conditions were like before the big bang.

Closed pending moderation.

EDIT: The thread has been opened again. All further conversation must make reference to peer-reviewed, mainstream science. "Speculation" henceforth must only be from mainstream science. No personal theories.
 
Last edited:
Space news on Phys.org
  • #32
Space can be described geometrically. If time and space are interchangeable, does that mean that time is geometric too? Doesn't it come down to an understanding of dimensionality? To me, an event can't happen in a zero time state. When we talk about quantum fluctuations occurring that spawn universes, how can these occur without a prior temporal dimension in which they can occur? There is only the singularity at t=0 which is a boundary conditional on our understanding that the universe has a beginning. However, if this 'beginning' was a phase transition of something else that already previously existed it would mean that t>0. It's hard to see how there can be negative time, or for that matter zero time. Yes, time can be run backwards but that is within the temporal dimension, not without it. No matter how it's modeled, it's always going to remain in the realm of speculation because we are confined within our own spacetime. Perhaps there is more than one dimension of time, but without any dimension of time at all I would argue that any geometric spatial dimension can have no real presence or existence.

If there are many universes in the multiverse, each with its own spacetime continuum, how would their time relate to our own, especially if there are wormholes that connect them? Wouldn't it imply that there was some kind of absolute time which linked them all together?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
786
  • · Replies 38 ·
2
Replies
38
Views
6K
  • · Replies 69 ·
3
Replies
69
Views
6K
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
4K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
5K