Existance of time before big bang

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter dhruv mishra
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Big bang Time
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on the existence of time before the Big Bang, exploring whether time existed prior to this event and the implications of such a notion. Participants examine various models and theories related to the origins of time and the nature of the universe's expansion, engaging in both speculative and technical reasoning.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants propose that any description of "before" the Big Bang is purely speculative.
  • Others argue that there are models that extend back in time before the Big Bang, suggesting that at least one is predictive and should be tested.
  • A participant expresses unease with the idea that time before 'time' implies a pre-existing background for the universe.
  • One viewpoint suggests visualizing the Big Bang as a central point in a timeline, with time extending in two directions, creating both a mass universe and an antimass universe.
  • Another participant challenges the idea of time moving in two directions, asserting that current theories do not explain conditions at t=0 or what existed before that time.
  • Some participants discuss the concept of the "arrow of time," suggesting it may be an illusion and that all states exist simultaneously, while others maintain that time only moves forward.
  • There are claims that causality may not be strictly directional, with some arguing that effects could imply or bring about their causes.
  • Participants express skepticism about the assertion that time can only run in one direction, questioning the validity of such a claim given the complexities of the universe.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the existence of time before the Big Bang, with multiple competing views and significant disagreement on the nature of time and causality.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include unresolved mathematical steps regarding the nature of time and causality, as well as the dependence on definitions of time and the Big Bang. The discussion reflects a range of assumptions and speculative ideas without definitive conclusions.

  • #31
Travis_King said:
Agreed. And as you stated, before the big bang, all current theories break down. There is no math to describe what happened at this state. And no one has any evidence against anything existing prior to the big bang or even at time zero, so really what can we hope for in the way of maths and evidence in a topic such as this? Does that mean we shut it down? Many of the great discoveries in this field were, while substantiated with math, initially nothing but conjecture and speculation. Speculation is not always senseless.

Speculation without knowledge of the field or accurate data to describe anything is both pointless and against forum rules, speculating explanations must be based on something. As far as I am concerned the OP was answered; current physics cannot say what, if anything conditions were like before the big bang.

Closed pending moderation.

EDIT: The thread has been opened again. All further conversation must make reference to peer-reviewed, mainstream science. "Speculation" henceforth must only be from mainstream science. No personal theories.
 
Last edited:
Space news on Phys.org
  • #32
Space can be described geometrically. If time and space are interchangeable, does that mean that time is geometric too? Doesn't it come down to an understanding of dimensionality? To me, an event can't happen in a zero time state. When we talk about quantum fluctuations occurring that spawn universes, how can these occur without a prior temporal dimension in which they can occur? There is only the singularity at t=0 which is a boundary conditional on our understanding that the universe has a beginning. However, if this 'beginning' was a phase transition of something else that already previously existed it would mean that t>0. It's hard to see how there can be negative time, or for that matter zero time. Yes, time can be run backwards but that is within the temporal dimension, not without it. No matter how it's modeled, it's always going to remain in the realm of speculation because we are confined within our own spacetime. Perhaps there is more than one dimension of time, but without any dimension of time at all I would argue that any geometric spatial dimension can have no real presence or existence.

If there are many universes in the multiverse, each with its own spacetime continuum, how would their time relate to our own, especially if there are wormholes that connect them? Wouldn't it imply that there was some kind of absolute time which linked them all together?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
2K
  • · Replies 69 ·
3
Replies
69
Views
7K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
5K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K