Existence of a certain increasing function

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the existence of a monotonically increasing function with jump discontinuities at every rational number within the interval [0,1]. The proposed function, defined as f(x) = ∑(g(q)) for rational q in [0,x], where g(q) = exp(-q) or 0 if p = 0, is confirmed to be monotonically increasing and bounded. It is established that f is continuous at every irrational number and discontinuous at every rational number, supported by a delta-epsilon proof. An alternative approach using the function G(x) = ∑(2^-k * f_p_k(x)) is also discussed, reinforcing the properties of monotonicity and boundedness.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of monotonically increasing functions
  • Familiarity with jump discontinuities and continuity concepts
  • Knowledge of delta-epsilon proofs in real analysis
  • Basic understanding of rational and irrational numbers
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of monotonic functions in real analysis
  • Explore delta-epsilon proofs for continuity and discontinuity
  • Research the implications of using different functions like exp(-q) versus 2^-q
  • Investigate other examples of functions with jump discontinuities
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, students of real analysis, and anyone interested in the properties of functions with discontinuities and monotonicity.

gamma5772
Messages
22
Reaction score
0
I'm wondering if there is a monotonically increasing function with a jump discontinuity at every rational (or any other dense, countable subset of the reals). Here's a specific candidate that I've come up with:

Let g:\mathbb{Q} \cap [0,1] \rightarrow \mathbb{R} take the rational p/q (p and q coprime) to exp(-q) (or 0 if p = 0). Let f:[0,1] \rightarrow \mathbb{R}. f(x) = \sum_{q \in \mathbb{Q} \cap [0,x]} g(q)

It is monotonically increasing and bounded, and I'm pretty sure it's well defined, but I'd just like to be sure. I also believe it is continuous at every irrational and discontinuous at every rational (which can be shown using a simple delta-epsilon proof).
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I am having difficulty following your derivation.

Here is a simpler (I think) example.

For each rational (p) in the interval [0,1] let fp(x) = 0 for x < p and fp(x) = 1 for x ≥ p. Next arrange the rationals in some countable order p1, p2, ...
Then G(x) = ∑2-kfpk(x) has the desired property.
 
I didn't undestand why you chose exp(-q) in your OP, when you don't seem to be using any properties of e. I think 2^-q would be just as good.

It is monotonically increasing
obviously
and bounded
because if you sum the discontiuities including the duplicates when p and q are not coprime, the sum is bounded

I also believe it is discontinuous at every rational
obviously
and continuous at every irrational (which can be shown using a simple delta-epsilon proof).
Well, I wouldn't call it a "simple" proof, but I think it this is valid:
Let f(1) = S. Choose \epsilon.
Then there are only a finite number of rationals q_i whose discontinuities sum to S-\epsilon/2.
Therefore there is a finite length interval around any irrational point x which does not contain any of the q_i.
So the function can not vary by more than \epsilon/2 in this interval
So you can find a \delta to prove continuity at x.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K