Existence of Virtual Particles

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the concept of virtual particles within quantum mechanics and quantum field theory, particularly in relation to their existence and the implications of different interpretations of quantum mechanics, such as the Copenhagen interpretation. Participants explore the theoretical underpinnings and mathematical representations of virtual particles, as well as their experimental implications.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants assert that according to the Copenhagen interpretation of quantum mechanics, nothing exists until observed, raising questions about the existence of virtual particles.
  • One participant suggests that virtual particles are often considered artifacts of perturbation theory, with exceptions for resonances.
  • Another viewpoint posits that describing phenomena in terms of virtual particles is merely one of many equivalent descriptions, emphasizing that the mathematical series expansion does not imply that individual terms represent actual events.
  • There is a suggestion that while the existence of virtual particles may be uncertain, quantum electrodynamics (QED) and quantum chromodynamics (QCD) have been validated through experimental success.
  • A participant explains that in quantum field theory, virtual particles arise in the context of path integrals and propagators, which allow for energies that do not conform to traditional energy-momentum relations.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the existence and interpretation of virtual particles, with no consensus reached on whether the Copenhagen interpretation applies to quantum field theory or how to reconcile the existence of virtual particles with observational constraints.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include the dependence on specific interpretations of quantum mechanics, the mathematical nature of virtual particles, and the unresolved status of their existence in experimental contexts.

Bose
Messages
25
Reaction score
0
As I understand it, according to the Copenhagen interpretation of QM, nothing can be said to exist until it is observed. I have also read that it is impossible to observe virtual particles in an experiment.

How is it then that virtual particles can be said to exist?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
...if a tree falls in the forest...
 
Do a search of this forum for "virtual particles" You will find much to read and consider--including the fact that virtual particles, almost always, are artifacts of perturbation theory. The "almost always" makes allowances for resonances.
Regards,
Reilly Atkinson
 
I would say that a description of what happens in terms of virtual particles is just one of many equivalent ways to describe the same thing. Virtual particles appear in the mathematics when a certain function is expanded in a series, kind of like the expansion exp(x)=1+x+x2/2+x3/6+..., but I don't think it would make sense to say that it's the individual terms in the series that describe what "actually" happens.

The statement "nothing can be said to exist until it is observed" is pretty strange. I guess you can say that, but in that case I'd rather treat that statement as a partial definition of what we mean by "existence" instead of as a statement about quantum mechanics. But I'd rather not say that at all. :smile:
 
We can not tell wether they exists or not I think, however we can look if QED, QCD etc makes sense with experiment, and they indeed do that.

Also one has find the real counterparts of the proposed virtual particles (Z, W +/- , gluons) so that was also a gret sucess for quantum field theory.

And I am not sure wheter 'Copenhagen interpretation of QM' applies to QFT or not.
 
My understanding of virtual particles is this:

In quantum field theory, you can describe the amplitude of a field by a path integral ( for a heuristic motivation of this path integral, maybe you've read the first chapter of Zee's QFT in a Nutshell, that's very nice ) You can't calculate this path integral exactly, but you have to expand it in a power series and integrate term by term. In each term, you will encounter so called propagators. In these propagators, you integrate over all possible momentum. And that's not what you're used to do; for example, you're used to that a particle obeys

[tex] E^{2} - p^{2} = m^{2}[/tex]

So these propagators appear to describe particles with energies lying "off-shell", allowing also energies which don't obey the formula above. The particles pop up during the traveling of the field from A to B. These particles are called virtual, because they don't have to obey the energy condition. But they certainly contribute to the amplitude !
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
4K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
5K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K