MHB Expanding Brackets: Math Help for 2nd Term Maths

  • Thread starter Thread starter raechelc93
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Expanding
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around expanding the expression \( (p-q+r^2)(3-(p^2+q^2)) \). The initial confusion stems from the presence of double brackets, but it is clarified that the expression can be simplified by distributing each term in the first bracket across the second. The correct interpretation of the second bracket is confirmed as \( (3-p^2-q^2) \), which is equivalent to \( 3 - (p^2 + q^2) \). The process involves recognizing that multiplying by -1 distributes across the terms in the parentheses. Ultimately, the user resolves their confusion and understands the distribution process involved in expanding the expression.
raechelc93
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Hi there,

I am currently doing an Ext Math 1 subject and haven't really come across any issues when needing to expand brackets, however, have come across the below equation I can't quite figure out... Any help would be greatly appreciated!

\( (p-q+r^2)(3-(p^2+q^2)) \)

The double brackets as well as the 3rd term in the first set of brackets has got me very confused and I can't seem to figure out how to even start with this one.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
you’ve posted an expression, not an equation (there is no equal sign)

$(p-q+r^2)(3-p^2-q^2)$

to expand, distribute the $p$, then the $-q$, and finally the $r^2$ to the three terms in the second set of parentheses ...

$3p-p^3-pq^2 -3q + p^2q +q^3 +3r^2 -p^2r^2 -q^2r^2$

note the expanded expression is less “simplified” than the original factored expression ... expanding doesn’t always yield a better representation
 
Hi Skeeter,

Thanks for responding so quick! There are 2 sets of brackets within the second set though.. \[ (3-(p^2+q^2)) \] would it still be the same process if this is the case?

It looks like you altered the second set of brackets from the orignal to get \[ (3-p^2-q^2) \] - how/why did you change it?
 
Nevermind - I just figured it out :)
 
$-(p^2+ q^2)$ is the same as $(-1)(p^2+ q^2)$ so we are multiplying $p^2+ q^2$ by -1. Using the fact that "multiplication distributes over addition", that is $(-1)(p^2)+ (-1)(q^2)= -p^2+ (-q^2)= -p^2- q^2$.
 
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top