MHB Expanding Brackets: Math Help for 2nd Term Maths

  • Thread starter Thread starter raechelc93
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Expanding
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around expanding the expression \( (p-q+r^2)(3-(p^2+q^2)) \). The initial confusion stems from the presence of double brackets, but it is clarified that the expression can be simplified by distributing each term in the first bracket across the second. The correct interpretation of the second bracket is confirmed as \( (3-p^2-q^2) \), which is equivalent to \( 3 - (p^2 + q^2) \). The process involves recognizing that multiplying by -1 distributes across the terms in the parentheses. Ultimately, the user resolves their confusion and understands the distribution process involved in expanding the expression.
raechelc93
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Hi there,

I am currently doing an Ext Math 1 subject and haven't really come across any issues when needing to expand brackets, however, have come across the below equation I can't quite figure out... Any help would be greatly appreciated!

\( (p-q+r^2)(3-(p^2+q^2)) \)

The double brackets as well as the 3rd term in the first set of brackets has got me very confused and I can't seem to figure out how to even start with this one.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
you’ve posted an expression, not an equation (there is no equal sign)

$(p-q+r^2)(3-p^2-q^2)$

to expand, distribute the $p$, then the $-q$, and finally the $r^2$ to the three terms in the second set of parentheses ...

$3p-p^3-pq^2 -3q + p^2q +q^3 +3r^2 -p^2r^2 -q^2r^2$

note the expanded expression is less “simplified” than the original factored expression ... expanding doesn’t always yield a better representation
 
Hi Skeeter,

Thanks for responding so quick! There are 2 sets of brackets within the second set though.. \[ (3-(p^2+q^2)) \] would it still be the same process if this is the case?

It looks like you altered the second set of brackets from the orignal to get \[ (3-p^2-q^2) \] - how/why did you change it?
 
Nevermind - I just figured it out :)
 
$-(p^2+ q^2)$ is the same as $(-1)(p^2+ q^2)$ so we are multiplying $p^2+ q^2$ by -1. Using the fact that "multiplication distributes over addition", that is $(-1)(p^2)+ (-1)(q^2)= -p^2+ (-q^2)= -p^2- q^2$.
 
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Is it possible to arrange six pencils such that each one touches the other five? If so, how? This is an adaption of a Martin Gardner puzzle only I changed it from cigarettes to pencils and left out the clues because PF folks don’t need clues. From the book “My Best Mathematical and Logic Puzzles”. Dover, 1994.
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top