Expanding Laser Beams with Focusing Lenses: Possibilities and Limitations

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter muffins321
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Lasers Lenses
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the use of focusing lenses to expand and manipulate a laser beam for a home project. Participants explore the theoretical and practical aspects of how laser beams interact with different types of lenses, including concave and convex lenses, and the implications for beam shape and size.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Homework-related

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants suggest that a laser beam will expand after passing through a focusing lens, particularly if a concave lens is used.
  • There is a discussion about whether the beam will refract or simply expand, with some noting that refraction occurs within the lens regardless of its type.
  • One participant expresses a goal to use both concave and convex lenses to manipulate the beam's shape and size, questioning the feasibility of their plan.
  • Concerns are raised about the potential for lens damage if the laser is powerful enough to burn through materials.
  • Some participants propose using a drop of water as an alternative lens to achieve beam expansion.
  • There is a suggestion that the shape of the beam exiting the lens will remain consistent with its shape upon entering, which is linked to how optical devices like telescopes function.
  • Technical advice is provided regarding the focal lengths of lenses and their arrangement to achieve the desired beam manipulation.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a mix of agreement and differing opinions on the effectiveness of using multiple lenses to expand and focus the laser beam. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the best approach and the feasibility of the proposed methods.

Contextual Notes

Participants mention the importance of understanding lens focal lengths and the potential risks associated with using lasers, particularly regarding eye safety. There is also uncertainty about the specific outcomes of the proposed lens configurations.

Who May Find This Useful

Individuals interested in optics, laser applications, and DIY projects involving light manipulation may find this discussion relevant.

muffins321
Messages
11
Reaction score
0
I'm doing this for a home project over the summer.

So let's say I took a small laser and passed the beam through some focusing lenses (or evena single lense). Is it possible for the beam to expand?
Also, if the laser is powerful enough to burn through paper, will the focusing lenses be damaged?

Thank You very much to anybody who answers. :smile:
 
Science news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF.
muffins321 said:
I'm doing this for a home project over the summer.

So let's say I took a small laser and passed the beam through some focusing lenses (or evena single lense). Is it possible for the beam to expand?
Yes. After coming to a focus, the laser beam will start expanding beyond that point. Or, if it happens to be a negative lens -- i.e. a concave one shaped like )( -- then the laser beam will start expanding right after the lens.
Also, if the laser is powerful enough to burn through paper, will the focusing lenses be damaged?
Probably not, especially if the beam's focused spot is not located right at one of the lenses.
Thank You very much to anybody who answers. :smile:
You're welcome.
 
Wow, thanks so much, it's really going to help. If it's not any trouble, I'd like to ask a few more questions.

So, the beam will expand, not refract right?

Also, it will when it expands, it won't take on a flash-light type role, where the light is shining everywhere right?
 
muffins321 said:
Wow, thanks so much, it's really going to help. If it's not any trouble, I'd like to ask a few more questions.

So, the beam will expand, not refract right?

Also, it will when it expands, it won't take on a flash-light type role, where the light is shining everywhere right?

there is refraction happening within the lens regardless of if its a concave lens like redbelly98 showed, which will diverge ( spread out ) the beam, or if its a convex lens that is used to focus a beam

see this link ... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lens_(optics)

yes after going through a concave lens the laser light beam will be spread out into a more diffuce bright glow rather than a narrow beam.cheers
Dave
 
Okay, thanks, the link also helped. :D

The goal of my project is to pass a laser beam through a concave lens to spread out the beam and increasing it in size, but then also sending it through a convex lens so that it focuses. Both of the lenses will be circles, so my plan is to have the straight beam turn into a more circular beam by the time it passes through both of the lenses (so it will be like a tubelight without the actual tube). Although, I do think I will need more than two lenses.

Not sure if this will work, hopefully it will. Do you think it will work in the end, after a lot of tweaking, or is this plan hopeless? :D I won't care if you just crush my plan right before my eyes, I don't like wasting my time doing something that won't work in the end.
 
muffins321 said:
Okay, thanks, the link also helped. :D

The goal of my project is to pass a laser beam through a concave lens to spread out the beam and increasing it in size, but then also sending it through a convex lens so that it focuses. Both of the lenses will be circles, so my plan is to have the straight beam turn into a more circular beam by the time it passes through both of the lenses (so it will be like a tubelight without the actual tube).

the shape of the beam out of the lens will be the same shape it was when it entered the lens
Think about the way a refractor telescope (the one with lenses) or binoculars work...
if they changed the shape of the light beam from an object, we would never see that object the way it looks without the lens. we see the same shape, just magnified...

look a little way down that wiki page to the heading ... Imaging properties to see what I mean

Dave
 
Last edited:
muffins321 said:
Not sure if this will work, hopefully it will. Do you think it will work in the end, after a lot of tweaking, or is this plan hopeless? :D I won't care if you just crush my plan right before my eyes, I don't like wasting my time doing something that won't work in the end.

Whether or not you succeed or fail, please be make yourself aware that even small lasers can cause permanent eye damage, up to and including blindness.

Are you sure your skills are up to it?
 
Last edited:
Oh, so I need to find another way to expand it...

And yes, my skills are up to it, I have protective goggles. :smile:
 
You need a rather strong lens (short focal length) to expand the laser much. You might have better luck with a drop of water to function as the lens.
 
  • #10
muffins321 said:
Oh, so I need to find another way to expand it...

And yes, my skills are up to it, I have protective goggles. :smile:

I don't understand what you mean by changing the "shape" of the beam. The beam is circular, or rather cylindrical if you think of a small section of the beam path. At least I think it is. Wouldn't simply expanding the beam work for your purposes?
 
  • #11
It sounds like you want to expand the beam, this can be done using 2 lenses, both "focusing" lenses. You'll need to find the focal length of each lens.

You can get a good estimate of the focal length of a lens by holding the lens over a table directly underneath a florescent light bulb. Changing the height above the table should change the clarity of the image you see on the table. When you can see the image clearly, measure the distance. This is roughly the focal length.

Next, you'll want to pass the laser beam through the shorter focal length lens first. The beam will focus to a point and begin to diverge afterwards. When the beam travels 2 focal distances, it will be at its original size (beam diameter). You'll want to place the longer focal length lens at exactly its focal length after the point when the beam is focused to the tightest spot (1 focal length of the first lens).

As the beam travels beyond 2f it expands to a size larger than its original diameter, when you place the second lens you will collimate the beam (reduce divergence as much as possible). Thus, the placement of the second lens is more critical. You should play with the distance, while observing the spot size at a point far away. It should exit the lens and stay roughly the same size.

Good luck.
 
  • #12
dmriser said:
It sounds like you want to expand the beam, this can be done using 2 lenses, both "focusing" lenses. You'll need to find the focal length of each lens.

You can get a good estimate of the focal length of a lens by holding the lens over a table directly underneath a florescent light bulb. Changing the height above the table should change the clarity of the image you see on the table. When you can see the image clearly, measure the distance. This is roughly the focal length.

Next, you'll want to pass the laser beam through the shorter focal length lens first. The beam will focus to a point and begin to diverge afterwards. When the beam travels 2 focal distances, it will be at its original size (beam diameter). You'll want to place the longer focal length lens at exactly its focal length after the point when the beam is focused to the tightest spot (1 focal length of the first lens).

As the beam travels beyond 2f it expands to a size larger than its original diameter, when you place the second lens you will collimate the beam (reduce divergence as much as possible). Thus, the placement of the second lens is more critical. You should play with the distance, while observing the spot size at a point far away. It should exit the lens and stay roughly the same size.

Good luck.

Good post.

In addition, to get a reasonalbe measure of the focal length the distance to lamp or over head light needs to be greater then 10x the focal distance. Note that you will be focusing an image of the source.
 
  • #13
davenn said:
the shape of the beam out of the lens will be the same shape it was when it entered the lens
Think about the way a refractor telescope (the one with lenses) or binoculars work...
In fact, muffins321 could just use binoculars (or a telescope, or a monocular) to expand the beam. Send the beam straight into the eyepiece, and an expanded beam will come out the other end. Do not look into the binoculars/telescope/monocular while doing this!
 
  • #14
really? That's great! :D
But the shape will be a circle right? not something ugly or malformed? :D
 
  • #15
muffins321 said:
really? That's great! :D
But the shape will be a circle right? not something ugly or malformed? :D

In the absence of severe aberrations it should be the same shape leaving as it was when it entered. I don't think you will have a problem as long as you aren't using the cheapest of the cheap equipment.
 
  • #16
Okay, thanks. :D
Now all I have to worry about is making sure the beam still has enough intenisty to brun someone when it coems out of the lenses.
 
  • #17
all laser beams are zernike polynomial functions(mostly),
however the basic TEM00 mode is guassian, these beams, have a beam waist, where the are the thinnest, or where the spot size is least, correspondingly they have what is called a railegh range, within which the beam does not diverge appreciably, if you force it to converge by a lens, you reduce the rayleigh length, further to burn the paper, you need high energy focussed, but you are also limited by your laser energy, you need to keep it long at the beam waist to actually burn it, if you are working with an ordinary low power laser
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #18
sorry its hermite polynomial functions not zernike
 
  • #19
sugeet said:
all laser beams are [STRIKE] zernike [/STRIKE] hermite polynomial functions(mostly),
however the basic TEM00 mode is guassian, these beams, have a beam waist, where the are the thinnest, or where the spot size is least, correspondingly they have what is called a railegh range, within which the beam does not diverge appreciably, if you force it to converge by a lens, you reduce the rayleigh length, further to burn the paper, you need high energy focussed, but you are also limited by your laser energy, you need to keep it long at the beam waist to actually burn it, if you are working with an ordinary low power laser
Laser beams can be expressed as the sum of \text{(hermite polynomial)} \cdot \text{(gaussian)} terms. But I don't see the relevance to this discussion -- the OP just wants to expand a beam, and we don't even know whether it's TEM00.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
7K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
31K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K