Expanding over R and L polarisations

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter StevieTNZ
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Expanding
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on expanding the tensor products of R and L polarizations in the H/V basis, specifically the expressions |RR> + |LL> and |RR> - |LL>. Participants explore the implications of complex numbers in these expansions, particularly how to handle terms involving R = (H + iV) and L = (H - iV). The conversation highlights the need for clarity in applying bilinearity to tensor products and resolving confusion around the relationships between the states |HH> and |VV>.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum states and notation, specifically |RR>, |LL>, |HH>, and |VV>.
  • Familiarity with complex numbers and their manipulation in quantum mechanics.
  • Knowledge of tensor products and bilinearity in quantum state expansion.
  • Basic concepts of polarization states in quantum optics.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of tensor products in quantum mechanics.
  • Learn about the bilinear expansion of quantum states.
  • Explore the implications of complex numbers in quantum state transformations.
  • Investigate the relationship between polarization states and their mathematical representations.
USEFUL FOR

Quantum physicists, students of quantum mechanics, and researchers working with polarization states in quantum optics will benefit from this discussion.

StevieTNZ
Messages
1,944
Reaction score
837
We expand over, in the H/V basis, |RR> + |LL>, likewise |RR> - |LL>. Because R = (H + iV) and L = (H - iV), how do we factor in the complex number to obtain the final result?

So:
1. (H + iV)(H + iV) + (H - iV)(H - iV) and
2. (H + iV)(H + iV) - (H - iV)(H - iV)

Thanks,
Stevie
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Anyone?
 
What difficulties have you encountered in expanding this tensor product?
 
I guess my confusion lies with |HH> - |VV>, which allows RR combinations. That's why I'm asking what to do in cases involving complex numbers.
 
StevieTNZ said:
I guess my confusion lies with |HH> - |VV>, which allows RR combinations. That's why I'm asking what to do in cases involving complex numbers.

I don't see how your second sentence (complex number problem) logically follows your first one.
 
|HH> - |VV>
=(R + iL)(R + iL) - (R - iL)(R - iL)
= RR - RR + iLL - iLL + RiL + RiL ??
 
StevieTNZ said:
|HH> - |VV>
=(R + iL)(R + iL) - (R - iL)(R - iL)
= RR - RR + iLL - iLL + RiL + RiL ??

R=H+iV
H=(R+L)/2
 
So H = (R + L) and
V = -i (R - L)

=|H>|V> - |V>|H>
=(R + L) -i(R - L) - -i(R - L)(R + L)

-i = +1? (-i^2)

How do we expand over that?
 
What seems to be the problem exactly? Just use the bilinearity of ⊗:
(cA)⊗B = A⊗(cB) = c(A⊗B), (A+B)⊗C = A⊗C+B⊗C, A⊗(B+C) = A⊗B+A⊗C

R⊗R + L⊗L=(H + iV)⊗(H + iV) + (H - iV)⊗(H - iV) =
=(H⊗(H + iV) + iV⊗(H + iV)) + (H⊗(H - iV) - iV⊗(H - iV)) =
=H⊗H + H⊗iV + iV⊗H + iV⊗iV + H⊗H - H⊗iV - iV⊗H + iV⊗iV =
=H⊗H + i(H⊗V) + i(V⊗H) -V⊗V + H⊗H - i(H⊗V) - i(V⊗H) - V⊗V =
= 2(H⊗H - V⊗V)
Similarly, RR - LL= 2i (HV + VH).
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
1K
  • · Replies 41 ·
2
Replies
41
Views
6K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 37 ·
2
Replies
37
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K