Expansion of Fermat's Little Theorem

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter pacdude9
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Expansion Theorem
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on proving two mathematical identities related to Fermat's Little Theorem and Euler's Theorem. The first identity, p^{(q-1)} + q^{(p - 1)} ≡ 1 (mod pq), requires p and q to be distinct primes. The second identity, a^{\phi(b)} + b^{\phi(a)} ≡ 1 (mod ab), necessitates that a and b are coprime. The participants emphasize the importance of Euler's Totient Function in generalizing Fermat's theorem and suggest using group properties and Lagrange's theorem for intuitive proofs.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Fermat's Little Theorem
  • Knowledge of Euler's Theorem and Euler's Totient Function (φ(n))
  • Familiarity with modular arithmetic
  • Basic concepts of group theory, particularly Lagrange's theorem
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of Euler's Totient Function (φ) in detail
  • Learn about group theory and Lagrange's theorem applications
  • Explore proofs of Fermat's Little Theorem and its generalizations
  • Investigate examples of coprime integers and their properties in modular arithmetic
USEFUL FOR

Mathematics students, educators, and enthusiasts interested in number theory, particularly those studying modular arithmetic and the applications of Fermat's Little Theorem and Euler's Theorem.

pacdude9
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
I've got a pair of (related) problems that are keeping me stumped. The two problems they are asking me to prove are:

p^{(q-1)} + q^{(p - 1)} \equiv 1 \; (\!\!\!\!\!\! \mod \, pq)

a^{\phi(b)} + b^{\phi(a)} \equiv 1<br /> \; (\!\!\!\!\!\! \mod \, ab)

Where \phi(n) is Euler's Totient Function.

I know that these are similar, as the second problem is using Euler's Theorem, a generalization of Fermat's Little Theorem, I just can't seem to figure them out.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Can you show:
p^{q-1}+q^{p-1}\equiv 1 \pmod{p}
? If so can you do the same mod q and combine these results to get it mod pq?
 
BTW you are probably forgetting some requirements, because as stated your identities are false. Take for instance a=4, b=6, then you get:
\phi(a)=\phi(b)=2
a^{\phi(a)}+b^{\phi(b)}=4^2+6^2=52 \equiv 4 \pmod {ab=24}
Perhaps you meant for a and b to be relatively prime. And in the first you can take p=q=2 and get:
p^{q-1}+q^{p-1} = 2^1+2^1 = 4 \equiv 0 \pmod {pq=4}
Maybe p and q should be distinct?
 
rasmhop said:
Perhaps you meant for a and b to be relatively prime.
Maybe p and q should be distinct?

Thanks! Yes, in the first one, p and q are distinct primes, and in the second, a and b are coprime.
 
Indeed, Euler's Totient Function is a very nice generalization of Fermat's Little Theorem. There is an intuitive proof for both which is studied in "Olympiad Training" but if you're a student, you may try to use group properties. (hint- consider the set {1,2,...,p-1} and the multiplication modulo p. This is clearly a group. Then, What is the order of this group ? What is the order of each element? What does Lagrange's theorem implies ? Try first with Fermat's Little Theorem, and then you may try to expand in Euler's function)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 105 ·
4
Replies
105
Views
9K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K