- 5,197
- 38
I need help getting started on this problem:
A free particle moving in one dimension is in the initial state [itex]\Psi(x,0)[/itex]. Prove that [itex]<\hat{p}>[/itex] is constant in time by direct calculation (i.e. without recourse to the commutator theorem regarding constants of the motion).
Our professor strongly advised against doing it this way:
[tex]<\hat{p}> = \int{\Psi^* \hat{p} \Psi \, dx}[/tex]
instead saying that we should try this:
[tex]<\hat{p}> = \int{p |\phi(k,t)|^2 \, dk}[/tex]
Since we know that:
[tex]\Psi(x,0) = \frac{1}{\sqrt{2\pi}}\int_{-\infty}^{+\infty}{\phi(k)e^{ikx} \, dk}[/tex]
and therefore
[tex]\phi(k) = \frac{1}{\sqrt{2\pi}}\int_{-\infty}^{+\infty}{\Psi(x,0)e^{-ikx} \, dx}[/tex]
Yay Fourier transforms
My questions are:
1. Practically speaking, how does one go about expressing phi(k) using this method?
2. Even if I get a reasonable expression for phi(k), what about the time dependence? How do I then get phi(k,t)? I'm going to need that in order to find <p> and show that d<p>/dt = 0.
A free particle moving in one dimension is in the initial state [itex]\Psi(x,0)[/itex]. Prove that [itex]<\hat{p}>[/itex] is constant in time by direct calculation (i.e. without recourse to the commutator theorem regarding constants of the motion).
Our professor strongly advised against doing it this way:
[tex]<\hat{p}> = \int{\Psi^* \hat{p} \Psi \, dx}[/tex]
instead saying that we should try this:
[tex]<\hat{p}> = \int{p |\phi(k,t)|^2 \, dk}[/tex]
Since we know that:
[tex]\Psi(x,0) = \frac{1}{\sqrt{2\pi}}\int_{-\infty}^{+\infty}{\phi(k)e^{ikx} \, dk}[/tex]
and therefore
[tex]\phi(k) = \frac{1}{\sqrt{2\pi}}\int_{-\infty}^{+\infty}{\Psi(x,0)e^{-ikx} \, dx}[/tex]
Yay Fourier transforms
My questions are:
1. Practically speaking, how does one go about expressing phi(k) using this method?
2. Even if I get a reasonable expression for phi(k), what about the time dependence? How do I then get phi(k,t)? I'm going to need that in order to find <p> and show that d<p>/dt = 0.
Last edited: