Expectation value of kinetic energy

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on calculating the expectation value of kinetic energy for a particle with a given wave function, ψ(x), defined in the region -4≤X≤6. The user normalized the wave function and found |A|^2=3/250. However, their calculation of the expectation value of kinetic energy, =∫ψ*Tψ, yielded zero, which is incorrect. The correct expectation value, as provided in the reference book, is =3h^2/50m, highlighting the importance of correctly applying the second derivative in the kinetic energy operator.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum mechanics, specifically wave functions and normalization
  • Familiarity with the kinetic energy operator in quantum mechanics, T=−(h^2/2m)(d²/dx²)
  • Knowledge of expectation values in quantum mechanics
  • Basic calculus, particularly integration and differentiation
NEXT STEPS
  • Review the derivation of the kinetic energy operator in quantum mechanics
  • Study the process of normalizing wave functions in quantum mechanics
  • Learn about calculating expectation values for different operators
  • Explore examples of wave functions with piecewise definitions
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in quantum mechanics, particularly those studying wave functions and kinetic energy calculations. This discussion is beneficial for anyone looking to deepen their understanding of expectation values in quantum systems.

White_M
Messages
9
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Given the following hypothetic wave function for a particle confined in a region -4≤X≤6:

ψ(x)= A(4+x) for -4≤x≤1
A(6-x) for 1≤x≤6
0 otherwise


Using the normalized wave function, calculate the expectation value of the kinetic energy.

Homework Equations



I used ∫ψ*ψdx=1 to normaize the function and got that |A|^2=3/250.

The Attempt at a Solution


I know that T=\frac{\hat{P^2}}{2m}=\frac{-h^2}{2m}\frac{d^2}{dx^2}
I tried to calculate it using <T>=∫ψ*Tψ using the expression above and got zero which is not correct.

The solution given by the book is <T>=-\frac{h^2}{2m}\frac{3}{250}(0*1-5*2+0*1)=\frac{3h^2}{50m}

p.s
h in the formulas above is \frac{h}{2pi}

What am I doing wrong?

Thanks. Y.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The second derivative is not zero everywhere.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K