Expectation Value of Momentum in H-Atom

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the calculation of the expectation value of momentum for the hydrogen atom, particularly focusing on the ground state wavefunction and the implications of the results. Participants explore the mathematical formulation and physical interpretation of momentum in quantum mechanics, including the implications of symmetry and the nature of bound states.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses confusion about the expectation value of momentum being imaginary and questions their approach to the integral.
  • Another participant suggests simply evaluating the integral to find the expectation value.
  • It is noted that the vector momentum should be zero for the ground state wavefunction due to its hermitian nature.
  • Several participants discuss the integration of the ground state wavefunction and the implications of spherical symmetry, with some arguing that the integral cannot be zero while others assert that it must be.
  • A participant proposes an alternative method to estimate the electron's velocity based on the kinetic energy and the Hamiltonian, suggesting that the expectation value of momentum must be zero for real wavefunctions.
  • Another participant introduces a different momentum density operator to avoid the imaginary component, referencing the Klein-Gordon and Dirac formulations.
  • One participant provides a specific numerical estimate for the electron's speed, relating it to the fine structure constant.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

There is no consensus on the expectation value of momentum; participants express differing views on whether the integral evaluates to zero or not, and the implications of the results remain contested.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight the dependence on the properties of the wavefunction and the implications of spherical symmetry in the calculations. The discussion also reflects on the assumptions made regarding the nature of bound states and the hermitian properties of operators.

quantumdude
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Gold Member
Messages
5,564
Reaction score
24
Here's a silly question. I'm sure I should know the answer, but alas my most recent QM course was 9 years ago.

I sat down to calculate the expectation value of momentum in the H-atom today, because some kid on another forum wanted to know how fast an electron in an atom is. I was going to calculate [itex]<p>[/itex] and divide it by [itex]m[/itex] for him.

So I wrote down [itex]<p>=\int_V\psi_{100}^*(-i\hbar\nabla)\psi_{100} d^3x[/itex] ([itex]\psi_{100}[/itex] being the ground state H-atom wavefunction). Upon noticing that I've got a solitary [itex]i[/itex] sandwiched between two purely real functions, I didn't even bother to continue. It's going to come out imaginary.

What am I doing wrong? :confused:
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Not evaluating the integral. Just compute it and see.

Then, calculate <p^2> and take its root mean square and tell the kid that.
 
The vector momentum =0.
 
Tom Mattson said:
So I wrote down [itex]<p>=\int_V\psi_{100}^*(-i\hbar\nabla)\psi_{100} d^3x[/itex] ([itex]\psi_{100}[/itex] being the ground state H-atom wavefunction). Upon noticing that I've got a solitary [itex]i[/itex] sandwiched between two purely real functions, I didn't even bother to continue. It's going to come out imaginary.

What am I doing wrong? :confused:

It should come out 0, and in fact you just proved this:
the p operator being hermitean, its expectation value must be real for any vector. You showed that it must be a purely imaginary number. Hence it can only be 0.

And that's normal too: the expectation of momentum for any stationary bound state must be 0: given that a stationary state will not have the momentum change in time, and given that the fact that it is bound will confine (most of) the wavefunction to a bounded region, the C.O.G. cannot leave that bounded region, which it should, if there was a non-zero expectation value of momentum, after some time.
 
The integral is not zero. The ground state wavefunction is:

[tex]\psi_{100}(r)=\frac{1}{\sqrt{\pi}}\frac{1}{a_0^{3/2}}\exp(-r/a_0)[/tex]

If we integrate [itex]\psi^*_{100}(-i\hbar\nabla)\psi_{100}[/itex] over all space we get:

[tex]\frac{-i\hbar}{\pi a_0^3}\int_0^{2\pi}\int_{-1}^1\int_0^{\infty}\exp(-r/a_0)\frac{d}{dr}\exp(-r/a_0)r^2drd(\cos(\theta))d\phi[/tex]

Since the wavefunction doesn't depend on the angular coordinates, this integral is proportional to the following:

[tex]i\int_0^{\infty}r^2\exp(-2r/a_0)dr[/tex]

The integrand is not identically zero, and is nonnegative everywhere. So it's integral cannot vanish. So, it seems this result is purely imaginary and not zero.

There's got to be a mistake somewhere, but I don't see where. :confused:
 
Last edited:
The nabla is a vector operator. It produces something proportional to r_vector. Integrating that over spherically symmetrical space gives zero vector.
 
Tom Mattson said:
The integral is not zero. The ground state wavefunction is:

[tex]\psi_{100}(r)=\frac{1}{\sqrt{\pi}}\frac{1}{a_0^{3/2}}\exp(-r/a_0)[/tex]

If we integrate [itex]\psi^*_{100}(-i\hbar\nabla)\psi_{100}[/itex] over all space we get:

[tex]\frac{-i\hbar}{\pi a_0^3}\int_0^{2\pi}\int_{-1}^1\int_0^{\infty}\exp(-r/a_0)\frac{d}{dr}\exp(-r/a_0)r^2drd(\cos(\theta))d\phi[/tex]

Since the wavefunction doesn't depend on the angular coordinates, this integral is proportional to the following:

[tex]i\int_0^{\infty}r^2\exp(-2r/a_0)dr[/tex]

The integrand is not identically zero, and is nonnegative everywhere. So it's integral cannot vanish. So, it seems this result is purely imaginary and not zero.

There's got to be a mistake somewhere, but I don't see where. :confused:

I agree with Smallphi.
You forgot to include [itex]\hat{r}[/itex]. Integrating this over all angles gives zero.
 
One simple way to get an appropriate estimate of the velocity is to divide 13.6eV by the electron mass, multiply by 2 and then take the square-root thus finding that the electron travels at a bit less than one hundredth of the speed of light. This is correct because the expectation value of the kinetic energy is equal to the negative of the expectation value of the Hamiltonian for a Coulomb potential. I.e. -(-13.6eV).

Also, you can see that <\vec p> must be zero for any real wave-function (btw, eigenfunctions of this Hamiltonian can always be *chosen* as real) by just integrating by parts... you end up with the equation <\vec p>=-<\vec p> which implies that <\vec p>=0
 
To get rid of the " i " you might want to use following momentum
density operator:

[tex]{ i\hbar \over 2} \left( \frac{\partial \psi^*}{\partial x_i}\psi\ -\ \psi^*\frac{\partial \psi}{\partial x_i }\right)[/tex]

Where the psi is the relativistic wave function related to the Schrödinger
wave function as follows:

[tex]\psi\ =\ \Psi \ e^{-imc^2t/\hbar}, \qquad \mbox{$\Psi$ is the Schroedinger wave function}[/tex]

This gives the same result without the imaginary part. It's always real.
This is the Klein-Gordon momentum density operator, as well as the Dirac
momentum density operator, (after the spin contributions are split off
via the Gordon decomposition).Regards, Hans
 
Last edited:
  • #10
olgranpappy said:
divide 13.6eV by the electron mass, multiply by 2 and then take the square-root thus finding that the electron travels at a bit less than one hundredth of the speed of light.

A little bit less than one hundredth of the speed of light is 1/137.036 to be
a bit more exact, a value also known as alpha. :wink:


Regards, Hans
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
6K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 56 ·
2
Replies
56
Views
5K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K