Here's a silly question. I'm sure I should know the answer, but alas my most recent QM course was 9 years ago.(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

I sat down to calculate the expectation value of momentum in the H-atom today, because some kid on another forum wanted to know how fast an electron in an atom is. I was going to calculate [itex]<p>[/itex] and divide it by [itex]m[/itex] for him.

So I wrote down [itex]<p>=\int_V\psi_{100}^*(-i\hbar\nabla)\psi_{100} d^3x[/itex] ([itex]\psi_{100}[/itex] being the ground state H-atom wavefunction). Upon noticing that I've got a solitary [itex]i[/itex] sandwiched between two purely real functions, I didn't even bother to continue. It's going to come out imaginary.

What am I doing wrong?

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Expectation Value of Momentum in H-Atom

Loading...

Similar Threads - Expectation Value Momentum | Date |
---|---|

I Expectation value of momentum for free particle | Jun 14, 2016 |

Is the differential in the momentum operator commutative? | Feb 25, 2016 |

Expectation value of momentum | Nov 8, 2014 |

Why use a fourier transform to change PSI (x) to PSI (p) for expectation value of momentum? | Oct 30, 2014 |

Expectation value for momentum operator using Dirac Notation | Mar 2, 2014 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**