Expectation value of two annihilation operators

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the expectation value of two annihilation operators in quantum optics, specifically in the context of a beam splitter. The operator for one outgoing beam is defined as c = (a + ib)/√2. The intensity measured by a photodiode is proportional to , which evaluates to (⟨a†a⟩ + ⟨b†b⟩ + i(⟨a†b⟩ - ⟨b†a⟩))/2. The confusion arises from the equivalence of ⟨a†b⟩ and ⟨a†⟩⟨b⟩, which is clarified by the commutation properties of the mode operators involved.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum optics principles
  • Familiarity with annihilation and creation operators
  • Knowledge of expectation values in quantum mechanics
  • Basic grasp of beam splitter functionality
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the commutation relations of quantum operators
  • Learn about the mathematical representation of beam splitters in quantum optics
  • Explore the implications of intensity measurements in quantum systems
  • Investigate the role of photodiodes in quantum optics experiments
USEFUL FOR

Quantum physicists, optical engineers, and students studying quantum mechanics who seek to deepen their understanding of beam splitter effects and operator algebra.

Ancient_Nomad
Messages
15
Reaction score
0
Hello,

I was studying about the effect of a beam splitter in a text on quantum optics. I understand that if a and b represent the mode operators for the two beams incident on the splitter, then the operator for one of the outgoing beams is the following,
[tex]c = \frac{(a + ib)}{\sqrt{2}}[/tex]​

Now if I try to measure the intensity of this beam by a photodiode, the intensity will be proportional to-

[tex]<c^{\dag} c>[/tex]

On evaluating this, I get,
[tex]\frac{\left(<a^{\dag} a> + <b^{\dag} b> + i(<a^{\dag} b> - <b^{\dag} a>)\right)}{2}[/tex]
Now the book says, that this can be written as,
[tex]\frac{\left(<a^{\dag} a> + <b^{\dag} b> + i(<a^{\dag}><b> - <b^{\dag}><a>)\right)}{2}[/tex]

I am unable to understand this step, that is [tex]<a^{\dag} b> = <a^{\dag}><b>[/tex]
can someone please explain this.
I understand that these mode operators commute, but is this always true for any two commuting operators.

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
if you write what [itex]< a^{\dagger} \, b >[/itex] is, then I am sure that you can figure it out.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K