Expected value of the spin tensor operator

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on evaluating the one-gluon-exchange tensor part of a phenomenological potential between two particles, specifically the term S_{ij}=3(\vec{\sigma_i}\hat{r_{ij}})(\vec{\sigma_j}\hat{r_{ij}})-\vec{\sigma_i}\vec{\sigma_j}. The second term is straightforward to evaluate, yielding -3 for S=0 and 1 for S=1. However, the first term presents challenges, particularly in relation to the projection of the unit vector along the Z-axis, indicating dependence on both total spin (S) and its projection (Sz). The conversation also highlights the necessity of spherical harmonics expansion for non-spherically symmetric wave functions.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum mechanics and spin operators
  • Familiarity with one-gluon-exchange potentials
  • Knowledge of spherical harmonics and their applications in quantum mechanics
  • Experience with evaluating tensor operators in quantum systems
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the evaluation of tensor operators in quantum mechanics
  • Learn about one-gluon-exchange potentials and their implications in particle physics
  • Research the application of spherical harmonics in quantum state expansions
  • Explore the role of angular momentum in quantum systems, particularly in relation to spin and orbital angular momentum
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, particularly those specializing in quantum mechanics and particle physics, as well as graduate students seeking to deepen their understanding of tensor operators and one-gluon-exchange interactions.

Montejo
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Hello everyone,
I'm evaluating the one-gluon-exchange tensor part of a phenomenological potential between two particles, and it involves a term like this:
[tex]S_{ij}=3(\vec{\sigma_i}\hat{r_{ij}})(\vec{\sigma_j}\hat{r_{ij}})-\vec{\sigma_i}\vec{\sigma_j}[/tex]

With [tex]r_{ij}[/tex] the unit vector in the direction along the axis from the first to the second particle

The second term [tex]\vec{\sigma_i}\vec{\sigma_j}[/tex] is very easy to evaluate, it yields -3 for S=0 and 1 for S=1
But I can't solve the first term, whatever I try I always end up with terms including [tex]r^{z}_{ij}[/tex] the proyection of the unit vector along de Z-axis. I suppose that implies that it doesn't only depend on S but also on Sz, which doesn't sound right to me.

Can anyone help me? or even better guide me in the right direction?
Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If the wave function is spherically symmetric, then the average over angle is
[tex]<(\vec{\sigma_i}\hat{r_{ij}})(\vec{\sigma_j}\hat{r_{ij}})><br /> =(1/3)\vec{\sigma}\cdot\vec{\sigma}[/tex], so S_ij=0.
If the wave function is not spherically symmetric, the average is harder, and expansion in spherical harmonics may be necessary.
 
Last edited:
Thanks Meir, in fact it is not spherically symetric.
I worked out an expansion in spherical harmonics:
[tex]\sqrt{\frac{2\pi}{15}}(\sigma_{1-}\sigma_{2-}Y_{22}-(\sigma_{1-}\sigma_{2z}+\sigma_{1z}\sigma_{2-})Y_{21}-\frac{1}{\sqrt{6}}(\sigma_{1+}\sigma_{2-}-4\sigma_{1z}\sigma_{2z}+\sigma_{1-}\sigma_{2+})Y_{20}+(\sigma_{1+}\sigma_{2z}+\sigma_{1z}\sigma_{2+})Y_{2-1}+\sigma_{1+}\sigma_{2+}Y_{2-2})[/tex]
Is it right?

Now, how do I evaluate this? I need to solve it for S=1, L=1, J=1 and for S=1, L=2, J=1
I'm trying to reproduce some calculations and the results show that for L=1 the energy is raised by adding this term whereas it is lowered for the L=2 state, so L definitely does play a part.
In addition, there are three posible spin-functions with S=1 but the projection is not given, so how can we evaluate the terms that depend on the spin of one of the quarks?

Pfiu, lots of questions, as I said in the previous post, I would greatly appreciate a hint in the right direction more than a straightforward answer (which I wouldn't regret either, but learning is more important in my opinion)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K