Expected value of x for quantum oscillator - integration help

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
3 replies · 2K views
phosgene
Messages
145
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement



I have a wavefunction [itex]Cxe^{-ax^2}[/itex] and I have to find the expected value of x.

Homework Equations



[itex]∫_{-∞}^{∞} x^3 e^{-Ax^2} dx = 1/A^2 for A>0[/itex]

The Attempt at a Solution



I get an integral like this:

[itex]<x>=|C|^2 ∫_{-∞}^{∞} x^3 e^{-Ax^2} dx[/itex]

After trying integration by parts and failing (miserably), I took the coward's way out and went to an integration table. I found this:

[itex]∫_{-∞}^{∞} x^3 e^{-Ax^2} dx = 1/A^2 for A>0[/itex]

My question is this: my [itex]a=ωm/ \hbar[/itex] is always positive, right? I googled stuff on negative frequency, but I don't think that it applies in this situation (quantum oscillator).
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Actually, I think I got it using integration by parts, but I'd still like to know if my 'shortcut' is still valid.
 
If A<0, it's not that you need a different formula, it's that your integral doesn't converge at all.

Although for this specific integral I think you either wrote it down wrong or did the problem wrong because you're integrating an odd function and should just get 0 regardless of what a is (again, as long as it's positive so the integral converges)
 
I realized that now using Wolfram Alpha...that was my first thought, but then I thought that it would be too easy. I need to stop convincing myself that an easy solution is wrong solution...