Experiment using an Ostwald Viscometer

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the use of an Ostwald viscometer for measuring the viscosity of water at different temperatures. Participants are seeking clarification on the relevant formulas, units, and how to interpret the data collected during the experiment.

Discussion Character

  • Homework-related
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions the meaning of "h2o" and its relation to viscosity measurements, specifically asking if 0.99708 refers to water's density.
  • Another participant expresses confusion about the original question, suggesting a misunderstanding of the relationship between the formula, the substance, and its properties.
  • A participant mentions the need for the viscosity of water at 0°C and suggests using a specific reference for this value from the CRC handbook.
  • There is a discussion about converting viscosity values from centipoise to Pascal seconds, with one participant asking for clarification on the units involved.
  • Participants discuss the average time taken for water to pass through the viscometer and its relevance to viscosity calculations, with one participant noting the importance of averaging multiple trials.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express varying levels of understanding regarding the formulas and units used in the experiment. There is no consensus on the correct interpretation of certain values or the methodology for calculating viscosity.

Contextual Notes

Some participants mention specific temperature values and viscosity units, but there is uncertainty about the correct conversions and the sources of the data being used. The discussion reflects a lack of clarity on how to apply the Ostwald formula correctly.

aname
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
Summary:: Not sure how to

My question is what is h2o , because ts is for example : 48,25 and what is ps . Is h20 the 0,99708?

AD3F082A-3234-4316-A848-FF77E82F9639.png
48,25
E0CB2914-69D9-4215-AD92-4166999AC462.png
7C8C756C-E64B-443C-875C-A5AC77C67496.png
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Looks like you are mistaking formula with the substance itself, and the substance itself with its property. It is so chaotic I have no idea what you are asking.
 
Borek said:
Looks like you are mistaking formula with the substance itself, and the substance itself with its property. It is so chaotic I have no idea what you are asking.
Hi Borek, I know I should use the Ostwald formula,but I don't understand how and what to use.
I didn't have any physics in school, and that's why I don't understand it
 
To use the equation you’ve shown you need the viscosity for water at 0°C.

in the photograph below you’ll see that the viscosity in centipoise is given at 0°C. I’ll leave it to you to convert that to Pascal seconds. The first line of your table that you’re required to fill out asks you to use this formula to calculate the viscosity of water at 0°C. This is a reality check or a single point calibration as it were. The rest of the table should be filled out using the formula you’ve shown using the standard viscosity of water at 0° C as shown in the photograph. If you’re writing a report and require a reference for this number it comes from the CRC handbook of chemistry and physics, 61st edition, 1980–1981.
4A93B68B-3D2B-408E-B0FA-483E2DA4422C.jpeg
 
chemisttree said:
To use the equation you’ve shown you need the viscosity for water at 0°C.

in the photograph below you’ll see that the viscosity in centipoise is given at 0°C. I’ll leave it to you to convert that to Pascal seconds. The first line of your table that you’re required to fill out asks you to use this formula to calculate the viscosity of water at 0°C. This is a reality check or a single point calibration as it were. The rest of the table should be filled out using the formula you’ve shown using the standard viscosity of water at 0° C as shown in the photograph. If you’re writing a report and require a reference for this number it comes from the CRC handbook of chemistry and physics, 61st edition, 1980–1981.
View attachment 271949
thanks so much. I need to use 25grad Celsius, which is 0,893 this is for water . For the ts I need to divide it trough 3 but wat is for Ps
 

Attachments

  • 230D86C5-E91A-49ED-B925-C8EEE96CFBF3.png
    230D86C5-E91A-49ED-B925-C8EEE96CFBF3.png
    16.6 KB · Views: 350
Where did you get 0.893? What are the units? If this in in centipoise then YOU need to convert it to pascal seconds (ps).

FYI, CRC has this:
2947BB56-144C-48D2-BC3B-44A3E4EBF8B1.jpeg
 
Last edited:
chemisttree said:
Where did you get 0.893? What are the units? If this in in centipoise then YOU need to convert it to pascal seconds (ps).

FYI, CRC has this:
View attachment 271952
Hi ,I got it from a table from our professor. T(s) is now 48,37 but what is 10^-3 Pa*s
 

Attachments

  • 510BD5F4-33FC-4FD5-8010-3448586C059B.png
    510BD5F4-33FC-4FD5-8010-3448586C059B.png
    48.2 KB · Views: 371
aname said:
Hi ,I got it from a table from our professor. T(s) is now 48,37 but what is 10^-3 Pa*s
10-3Pa*s = 1 centipoise

The assignment wants you to express the viscosity in units of millipascal seconds or centipoise.
 
chemisttree said:
10-3Pa*s = 1 centipoise

The assignment wants you to express the viscosity in units of millipascal seconds or centipoise.
Sorry I'm just asking you stupid questions, but what does it have to do with the 48.37?
 
  • #10
aname said:
Sorry I'm just asking you stupid questions, but what does it have to do with the 48.37?
The time in seconds it takes for the solution to pass through a certain length of the viscometer is related to viscosity. 48.37 is the average of three trials of the time in seconds it took a sample of water to pass through the viscometer at 25 C. Average the three t(s) in your table for water at 0% concentration (pure water) and you will see where this comes from.
 

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
10K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
531
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K