- 4,229
- 61
Wondering what field expert we have here.. any science.
The discussion revolves around the experiences of participants in publishing scientific work across various fields, including medicine, archaeology, molecular biology, and education. Participants share their publication histories, the challenges of peer review, and personal anecdotes related to their research endeavors.
Participants express a range of experiences and opinions regarding the peer review process, with some agreeing on its flaws while others share differing views on its effectiveness. The discussion does not reach a consensus on the best methods for publication or peer review.
Limitations include varying definitions of what constitutes a publication, differing experiences with peer review, and the subjective nature of research interests among participants.
This discussion may be of interest to individuals involved in scientific research, those considering publication, and educators looking for insights into the publication process and peer review challenges.
Originally posted by Monique
Wondering what field expert we have here.. any science.
Originally posted by Monique
... peer review doesn't always work...
Originally posted by Loren Booda
I believe that peer review still allows for favoritism in any field, e. g., Alan Sokal's hoax. Is there a better method?