Explain the Inverse Function Theorem

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the multi-variable Inverse Function Theorem and the Implicit Function Theorem, emphasizing their significance in determining local functions and invertibility. The Implicit Function Theorem asserts that under certain conditions, the solution set of an equation can be expressed as a function. An example provided illustrates this with the equation e^{xf(x)} + f(x)^3 = 0, demonstrating the existence of a local function at the point (0,-1). The Inverse Function Theorem confirms that functions like e^x can be locally inverted, allowing for the calculation of derivatives without prior properties of the inverse function.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of multi-variable calculus
  • Familiarity with the concepts of continuity and differentiability
  • Knowledge of partial derivatives
  • Basic understanding of inverse functions and their properties
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the conditions for applying the Implicit Function Theorem in various scenarios
  • Explore the applications of the Inverse Function Theorem in real-world problems
  • Learn about the relationship between derivatives of functions and their inverses
  • Investigate examples of functions that satisfy the criteria for local invertibility
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, students of calculus, and anyone interested in advanced topics in multivariable analysis, particularly those focusing on the application of the Inverse Function Theorem and the Implicit Function Theorem.

transphenomen
Messages
52
Reaction score
0
I am studying the multi variable Inverse Function Theorem and the Implicit Function Theorem. I think my brain is rebelling against understanding them and I would appreciate if someone here could explain the two theorems semi rigorously as well as explain when they are used, and why they are important.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi transphenomen!

Let me explain you the theorems by some examples.

The implicit function theorem states that the solution set of an equation is locally a function. For example, say that we need a function f such that

[tex]e^{xf(x)}+f(x)^3=0[/tex]

Does such a function even exist? We might solve the equation analytically, but this won't work in this case (I think). But we can use the implicit function theorem to say that there exists locally such a function (if some conditions on the derivatives are satisfied).

As can easily be seen, the point (0,-1) satisfies the equation

[tex]e^{xy}+y^3=0[/tex]

All we got to do is take the partial derivatives with respect to y, this gives us

[tex]xe^{xy}+3y^2[/tex]

So you see that the partial derivatives in (0,-1) don't vanish, so there exists a local function

[tex]g:]-\delta,\delta[\rightarrow ]-1-\epsilon,-1+\epsilon[[/tex]

such that g(0)=-1 and

[tex]e^{xg(x)}+g(x)^3=0[/tex]

For the inverse function theorem, it just tells us when it's ok to locally invert a funtion. For example, consider the function ex, can we invert this function? You might say yes: the logarithm is the inverse, but that's the definition of the logarithm, nobody tells us that this definition is a good one.

Now, we know that ex is a continuous function that never has a zero derivative. So by applying the inverse function theorem, we know that there is an inverse function f locally. Furthermore, we know it's derivative:

[tex](f^{-1})^\prime(e^a)=\frac{1}{e^a}[/tex]

thus

[tex](f^{-1})^\prime(x)=\frac{1}{x}[/tex]

In particular, this allows us to calculate the derivative of the logarithm without needing any property about the logarithm!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K