Explain to me the flaw in this perpetual motion scheme

  • #1
178
23
Someone showed this to me, and I'm struggling to explain why this perpetual motion scheme is impossible.
A picture:
energy.png

Basically, this is a cylinder within a large reservoir, with water at the level of the reservoir water level. The mass would be dropped and then reach the bottom of the cylinder, and the overflowing water could be collected at the top. This water is now at a higher level than the large reservoir water level (and the water inside the cylinder could be maintained at the reservoir water level by the opening of some kind of valve). The higher pressure at this column of collected water would be used to bring the mass back to its original position (by means of a hydraulic actuator at the bottom, or something like that).

I'm neglecting all dissipative effects here. In the ideal case, does this break the first law of thermodynamics? My analysis is that the energy is conserved, since the mass "m" has some initial potential energy at the start and is back to that same energy level at the end of the cycle. Or does it break the second law because entropy increases?
 

Answers and Replies

  • #2
berkeman
Mentor
59,668
9,822
Thread closed for Moderation...
 
  • #3
berkeman
Mentor
59,668
9,822
We do not allow discussions of pseudoscience like PMMs and Over-Unity Mechanisms (not even for debunking them). They are on the Forbidden Topics List in the PF Rules (see INFO at the top of the page). Thread will stay closed.

From the Rules:

Forbidden Topics said:
 

Related Threads on Explain to me the flaw in this perpetual motion scheme

  • Poll
  • Last Post
3
Replies
57
Views
37K
Replies
9
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
6K
Replies
31
Views
7K
  • Last Post
Replies
17
Views
5K
  • Last Post
Replies
1
Views
7K
  • Last Post
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
3
Views
943
  • Last Post
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
5
Views
4K
Top