Explaining a Physics Formula in Non-Physics Terms: Answer B

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on understanding the physics formula "sinΘR = 1.22 λ/d," specifically regarding its application and the concept of resolving power. Participants seek clarification on how the dish's diameter influences resolving power and the meanings of the symbols in the formula. There is a suggestion that asking for explanations in simpler terms may not be effective in a physics-focused forum. Ultimately, the original poster indicates they have resolved their questions. The conversation highlights the importance of engaging with the material and seeking deeper understanding in technical discussions.
hidemi
Messages
206
Reaction score
36
Homework Statement
If the diameter of a radar dish is doubled, what happens to its resolving power assuming that all other factors remain unchanged?

A) The resolving power quadruples.
B) The resolving power doubles.
C) The resolving power is reduced to 1/2 of its original value.
D) The resolving power is reduced to 1/4 of its original value.
E) The resolving power does not change unless the focal length changes.

The answer is B.
Relevant Equations
sinΘR = 1.22 λ/d
According to the equation, the answer is B.
Since the lecture didn't cover much about it, can someone explain this formula in a less physics way? Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What have you done so far? E.g what have you found out ?
What is meant by resolving power?
Why will the dish’s diameter affect the resolving power?
What do the symbols in the formula “sinΘR = 1.22 λ/d” mean?

Edit. And asking for an explanation 'in a less physics way' may not be the best tactics in a forum dedicated to physics!
 
Last edited:
Steve4Physics said:
What have you done so far? E.g what have you found out ?
What is meant by resolving power?
Why will the dish’s diameter affect the resolving power?
What do the symbols in the formula “sinΘR = 1.22 λ/d” mean?

Edit. And asking for an explanation 'in a less physics way' may not be the best tactics in a forum dedicated to physics!
Thanks for your hints. I have solved it.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Correct statement about a reservoir with an outlet pipe'
The answer to this question is statements (ii) and (iv) are correct. (i) This is FALSE because the speed of water in the tap is greater than speed at the water surface (ii) I don't even understand this statement. What does the "seal" part have to do with water flowing out? Won't the water still flow out through the tap until the tank is empty whether the reservoir is sealed or not? (iii) In my opinion, this statement would be correct. Increasing the gravitational potential energy of the...
Thread 'A bead-mass oscillatory system problem'
I can't figure out how to find the velocity of the particle at 37 degrees. Basically the bead moves with velocity towards right let's call it v1. The particle moves with some velocity v2. In frame of the bead, the particle is performing circular motion. So v of particle wrt bead would be perpendicular to the string. But how would I find the velocity of particle in ground frame? I tried using vectors to figure it out and the angle is coming out to be extremely long. One equation is by work...
Back
Top