B Explanation for bright fringes in Single Slit Diffraction

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the confusion surrounding the formation of bright fringes in single-slit diffraction compared to the more straightforward double-slit experiment. Participants express difficulty in understanding why certain points interfere constructively while others do not, particularly at odd multiples of half-wavelengths. The central position is identified as the most favorable for constructive interference, leading to maximum intensity, but the reasons for this remain unclear. The conversation also touches on the conditions necessary for applying Fraunhofer diffraction and the implications of Fresnel diffraction. Overall, the complexity of the underlying mathematics and the lack of intuitive explanations for bright fringes in single-slit diffraction are highlighted.
Aurelius120
Messages
269
Reaction score
24
TL;DR
The formula for position of bright fringes of Single Slit Fraunhoffer diffraction is given by $$a\sin(\theta_n)=\frac{(2n+1)\lambda}{2}$$
$$\theta_n \approx \sin(\theta_n) \approx \tan(\theta_n)=\frac{x_n}{D}$$
##n=1,2,3,......##
Looking for an intuitive explanation for this formula.
The central bright fringe is brightest. Why?
In Young's Double Slit Experiment, we were shown the complete derivation for location of fringes, width of fringes etc. on interference by two point sources of light and all was well.
In Single Slit Diffraction we were just asked to remember the formulae as they were with little explanation.

I understand that all waves from points equidistant from slit-center on either side interfere constructively at the screen-center but why don't they cancel with waves from points that are in opposite phase? Why are waves from every point interfering constructively with waves from every other point? If there is a combination of both constructive and destructive, why is it brighter than other bright fringes?

A little research gives a clear explanation for dark fringes and why they are formed at path difference of ##n\lambda##. For example here.

However I cannot find an explanation for formation of maxima at ##\Delta x=\frac{(2n+1)\lambda}{2}##? Is the explanation intuitive or is the reason purely mathematical?(perhaps too complicated to be taught)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
BvU said:
Although there is a progressive change in phase as you choose element pairs closer to the centerline, this center position is nevertheless the most favorable location for constructive interference of light from the entire slit and has the highest light intensity if the Fraunhofer diffraction expression is reasonably applicable. If the conditions D >> a and D>> a2/λ are not met for this combination of slit width and screen distance, the Fresnel diffraction result may not have maximum intensity on the centerline.

Still don't understand why it is brightest?
1000016216.jpg

A and B will interfere constructively with each other but destroy C and then other points on either side will destroy whats left. It will be a Central Dark Fringe , Right?

And still don't see why bright fringe at odd multiples of half wavelength
 
I'm looking at the bottom half of lecture notes (Prof. Dmitri Pogosian, Alberta Ca), based on Young and Freedman, 12th ed. (I only have 11th ed, pp 1369...1376) and really don't know what to add.

And there's always the hyperphysics explanation (4 pages, phasors, etc)

Aurelius120 said:
In Young's Double Slit Experiment, we were shown the complete derivation for location of fringes, width of fringes etc. on interference by two point sources of light and all was well.
Note that there too the single-slit pattern appears -- as an envelope

##\ ##
 
Thread 'Why higher speeds need more power if backward force is the same?'
Power = Force v Speed Power of my horse = 104kgx9.81m/s^2 x 0.732m/s = 1HP =746W Force/tension in rope stay the same if horse run at 0.73m/s or at 15m/s, so why then horse need to be more powerfull to pull at higher speed even if backward force at him(rope tension) stay the same? I understand that if I increase weight, it is hrader for horse to pull at higher speed because now is backward force increased, but don't understand why is harder to pull at higher speed if weight(backward force)...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
908
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
28
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
21K
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
8K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
8K