How do escape peaks from gamma rays occur in annihilation processes?

Click For Summary
Escape peaks from gamma rays in annihilation processes occur when one of the annihilation photons, typically at 511 keV, escapes detection. This results in a detectable energy value of E_peak, which is equal to the gamma ray energy minus 511 keV. The discussion raises questions about the momentum of the electron-positron system before annihilation, particularly why it may have a vanishing total momentum leading to two emitted photons. Additionally, the interaction of the incident photon with a nucleus is questioned regarding its role in producing a particle-antiparticle pair with vanishing momentum. Understanding these dynamics is crucial, especially in applications like PET scans, where most detected photons are 511 keV and emitted back-to-back.
Angelos K
Messages
43
Reaction score
0
How do escape peaks occure?

I mean peaks originating from a gamma ray located at the Energy value of \ E_{peak} \equiv E_{gamma}-511KeV.

I read that an annihilation process takes place and one of the annihilation photons escapes detection.To arive at detecting an Energy of E_{peak} the undetected annihilation photon must have had the energy of 511KeV.

Is there any reason why the particle system before annihilation (electron/positron) had a vanishing total momentum, so that two photons of 511KeV were emitted? Why did the incident photon interact with a nucleus in a way such that the produced particle/antiparticle pair had vanishing momentum?

I'd appreciate help.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
The annihilation cross section is small at high energies, so most of the time positrons slow down in matter before annihilating.
PET scans use that, too - most of their photons are 511 keV and back-to-back, even though the original positron from beta decays can have a large momentum.
 
I do not have a good working knowledge of physics yet. I tried to piece this together but after researching this, I couldn’t figure out the correct laws of physics to combine to develop a formula to answer this question. Ex. 1 - A moving object impacts a static object at a constant velocity. Ex. 2 - A moving object impacts a static object at the same velocity but is accelerating at the moment of impact. Assuming the mass of the objects is the same and the velocity at the moment of impact...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K