Exploring Fourier Transforms and Integrability for Different Functions

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter shoplifter
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Fourier
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on proving that the function f(x) = (1 + |x|)^{-a} serves as the Fourier transform of an integrable function on R when a > 1. It is established that for 0 < a <= 1, the integral does not converge, indicating that the Fourier transform fails in this range. Additionally, the function f(x) = 1/(log(|x|^2 + 2)) is also examined, with the conclusion that its integrability requires further analysis. The necessity for the denominator to have a power greater than 1 is emphasized to ensure convergence during the inverse transform.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Fourier transforms and their properties
  • Knowledge of integrable functions and convergence criteria
  • Familiarity with mathematical analysis concepts, particularly limits and asymptotic behavior
  • Basic proficiency in handling logarithmic functions and their integrability
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the conditions for integrability of functions in the context of Fourier transforms
  • Explore the implications of the decay rate of functions on their Fourier transforms
  • Investigate the properties of logarithmic functions and their behavior at infinity
  • Learn about the implications of the Riemann-Lebesgue lemma on Fourier transforms
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, physics students, and anyone involved in signal processing or harmonic analysis who seeks to deepen their understanding of Fourier transforms and integrability conditions.

shoplifter
Messages
26
Reaction score
0
prove that f(x) = (1 + |x|)^{-a} is the Fourier transform of some integrable function on R, when a > 1. what happens when 0 < a <= 1? how about the function f(x) = 1/(log(|x|^2 + 2))?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Is this homework? If so, what have you done so far?
 
yes, and i realize that we want the integral to converge when we take the inverse transform. so in order to do that, I'm guessing the denominator has to have a power > 1, which is why we have that condition on a. so it will fail the second time, i guess. but i can't formalize my argument (and I'm clueless about the third one).

sry :(
 
any help please? :(
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
12K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
11K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
3K