Undergrad Exploring the Lamb Shift: G-Factor & Angular Momentum

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the Lamb Shift, which describes an upward energy shift in atomic orbitals due to vacuum fluctuations in the quantum electromagnetic field, rather than an electron interacting with itself. It highlights that the g-factor is slightly greater than 2, indicating a difference in energy levels between states 2S and 2P. The relationship between g = 2 and the z components of angular momentum is explained through the equality of intrinsic angular momentum and magnetic moment contributions. When g is greater than 2, the energy of the P state with j = 1/2 is lower than that of the S state with j = 1/2. This understanding clarifies the implications of the Lamb Shift on atomic energy levels and angular momentum.
Riverplatense
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Good day dear forum, greetings from Argentina. I am studying the Lamb Shift, which says that in the atomic orbitals, an upward energy shift occurs due to an interaction of the electron with itself. This means that a level s can have an energy slightly greater than a level p. So far so good, but there is something I do not understand and it is the following. This discovery also allowed us to estimate that the known factor g had a value slightly greater than 2 and not exactly 2 as previously thought. In the words of the book Rohlf Modern Physics from alpha to Z p.248: "There is a slight difference between the levels 2S (with j = 1/2) and 2P (with j = 1/2) since in the first case the j comes from the intrinsic angular momentum while in the second, the value of j comes from the unit of the orbital angular moment minus a half of the intrinsic angular momentum.If g is exactly equal to 2, then the z component of the angular momentum of the electron due to the intrinsic angular momentum is exactly equal to the z component of the magnetic moment due to a unit of orbital angular momentum. For g = 2, the energies of the n-fixed states depend only on the total angular momentum j and not on the sum of l and s that produce j, so since g is slightly greater than 2, the state P with j = 1/2 is less in energy than S with j = 1/2 ". I do not understand what g = 2 has to do with the z components of the moments being equal and why if g is greater than 2, the state P is smaller than that of S. I think I do not understand anything about that paragraph, any idea?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Riverplatense said:
the Lamb Shift, which says that in the atomic orbitals, an upward energy shift occurs due to an interaction of the electron with itself.

Actually, it's due to the effects of vacuum fluctuations in the quantum electromagnetic field. There is no "interaction of the electron with itself" in QED; the only interaction term in the QED Lagrangian is between electrons and photons.
 
  • Like
Likes DarMM and bhobba
Time reversal invariant Hamiltonians must satisfy ##[H,\Theta]=0## where ##\Theta## is time reversal operator. However, in some texts (for example see Many-body Quantum Theory in Condensed Matter Physics an introduction, HENRIK BRUUS and KARSTEN FLENSBERG, Corrected version: 14 January 2016, section 7.1.4) the time reversal invariant condition is introduced as ##H=H^*##. How these two conditions are identical?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
6K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
6K