Undergrad Exponential Operators: Inverting, Rearranging, Expanding

Click For Summary
When rearranging equations involving exponentials of operators, inverting an exponential like e^A results in e^(-A), provided that e^A exists, which is guaranteed for bounded operators. The discussion highlights that while inverting works under these conditions, the order of operations is crucial due to potential non-commutativity of operators. It is emphasized that the existence of the exponential function is key to applying this inversion. The conversation confirms that no additional conditions are necessary beyond the boundedness of the operator. Understanding these principles is essential for manipulating equations involving exponential operators effectively.
dyn
Messages
774
Reaction score
63
If I rearrange an equation invoving exponentials of operators and I take ex to the opposite side of the equation it becomes e-x. What happens if I try to take eA to the opposite side ? I know a exponential of operators can be expanded as a Taylor series which involves products of matrices but can this be inverted ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes, ##(e^{A})^{-1} = e^{-A}##
 
  • Like
Likes yungboss
Thanks. Are there any conditions for that to apply ? To invert an ordinary matrix requires a non-zero determinant. Are there any conditions on the operator/matrix in the exponential ? Also when taking the exponential over to the other side of the equation I presume order matters in case any operators do not commute ?
 
dyn said:
Thanks. Are there any conditions for that to apply ?

No. As long as ##e^A## exists (which it always does if ##A## is a bounded operator), then the above applies.

Also when taking the exponential over to the other side of the equation I presume order matters in case any operators do not commute ?

Yes.
 
  • Like
Likes dyn
I am studying the mathematical formalism behind non-commutative geometry approach to quantum gravity. I was reading about Hopf algebras and their Drinfeld twist with a specific example of the Moyal-Weyl twist defined as F=exp(-iλ/2θ^(μν)∂_μ⊗∂_ν) where λ is a constant parametar and θ antisymmetric constant tensor. {∂_μ} is the basis of the tangent vector space over the underlying spacetime Now, from my understanding the enveloping algebra which appears in the definition of the Hopf algebra...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
10K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
5K
  • · Replies 43 ·
2
Replies
43
Views
7K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K