Commutator of exponential operators

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
7 replies · 10K views
gentsagree
Messages
93
Reaction score
1
How do I compute the commutator [itex][a,e^{-iHt}][/itex], knowing that [itex][H,a]=-Ea[/itex]?

I tried by Taylor expanding the exponential, but I get [itex]-iEta[/itex] to first order, which seems wrong.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The answer I was expecting to get is something like [itex]e^{-iEt}[/itex]. This follows from the fact that I was trying to replicate the following calculation

[tex]e^{iHt}ae^{-iHt}=e^{-iEt}a[/tex]

which is said to be justified by [itex][H,a]=-Ea[/itex].

If I take my result to be true, I get

[tex]e^{iHt}ae^{-iHt}=e^{iHt}(e^{-iHt}a-iEta)=a-ie^{iHt}Eta[/tex]
 
Second order does the job...thanks.
 
gentsagree said:
Second order does the job...thanks.
I am surprised by that, as the final result has all orders, and just ignoring orders means changing the value of things.
 
It does the job in the sense that with two orders I can get back two terms which I can combine back together to form an exponential by recognising they are the first two terms in its Taylor expansion. I thought, naively, that one order would have been enough, but the fact that the first commutator vanishes doesn't make it work.