Exposure rate from thermal neutrons through water

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the exposure rate from thermal neutrons interacting with a water target, specifically focusing on the 1H(n,gamma)2H reaction. The participant successfully calculates the dose rate but struggles with converting this to exposure 100 cm beyond the target. They consider modeling the water disk as a point source due to the distance involved. Guidance is provided to simplify the calculations by removing energy values and focusing on gamma photon rates. The conversation emphasizes the importance of accounting for distance in the final exposure calculation.
Phillyfan321
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A beam of thermal neutrons (10^12 neutrons per cm^2 second) strikes a 1cm thick water target normal to its surface. The target is a round disk with diameter 20cm. Find the exposure rate (R/second) 100cm beyond the water target (the middle of the disk) from only the 1H(n,gamma)2H reaction. Ignore attenuation in water and air. Atomic density is 6e23 atoms/gram.

Homework Equations


The only real equation I know if for dose calculation, not exposure.

D(n,gamma) = 1.6e-13 (J/MeV) * Flux * Number atoms (given) * cross section of hydrogen * Energy gamma * AF

The Attempt at a Solution



I can get a value for the dose rate created from the (n, gamma) reaction, but am unsure how to get exposure 100cm past that point. The above formula gives a Dose rate absorbed in the water shield (we often used water as a substitute for tissue anyway). Would it be logical to create a secondary equation with the water disk as a disk source of radiation that is irradiating the point 100 cm away from its center? If so, how would a number in Gy/s be converted back to something usable to calculate exposure.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Phillyfan321 said:
Would it be logical to create a secondary equation with the water disk as a disk source of radiation that is irradiating the point 100 cm away from its center?
I guess so. A point-like source might be a good approximation as 100 cm >> 10 cm.
Phillyfan321 said:
If so, how would a number in Gy/s be converted back to something usable to calculate exposure.
Don't calculate energy values - the formula you posted multiplies gamma photons per time with their energy, you can remove the energy part to get photons per time. Then you just have to take the distance into account.
 
(a) The polarisation pattern is elliptical with maximum (1,1) and minimum (-1,-1), and anticlockwise in direction. (b) I know the solution is a quarter-wave plate oriented π/4, and half-wave plate at π/16, but don't understand how to reach there. I've obtained the polarisation vector (cos π/8, isin π/8) so far. I can't find much online guidance or textbook material working through this topic, so I'd appreciate any help I can get. Also, if anyone could let me know where I can get more...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
711
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
6K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K