Express x and y as a linear combination of v's

  • Thread starter Thread starter robertjford80
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Combination Linear
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around expressing variables x and y as linear combinations of given vectors in a linear algebra context. Participants are examining the setup of matrices and the implications of having more unknowns than equations.

Discussion Character

  • Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore different matrix setups and discuss the implications of having three vectors in a two-dimensional space. There are attempts to reduce matrices and questions about how to express x and y using the available vectors.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided guidance on how to approach the problem by suggesting the use of specific vectors as bases. However, there is a lack of consensus on the next steps after reducing the matrix, and multiple interpretations of how to express the variables are being explored.

Contextual Notes

There are constraints noted regarding the number of equations versus unknowns, and participants are questioning the feasibility of obtaining unique solutions given the dimensionality of the vectors involved.

robertjford80
Messages
388
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Screenshot2012-05-13at10858PM.png



The Attempt at a Solution



I can't figure out how to do this problem. If you set the matrix up like this

2 -1 2 1
3 1 1 1

You can't solve it because there are 3 unknowns and two equations.

I still don't really understand quite well when you set the matrix up vertically or horizontally but if you set it up like this

2 3
-1 1
2 1

there's no place to put the values for x and y to solve things.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Reduce the matrix and you'll get two pivots: 2 and 5/2.
 
Last edited:
But if I reduce it to

x x x x
0 0 x x

where x is any number, I still won't be able to solve it because there will be two unknowns in the first row.
 
You have only 3 v's. So, in column form, after reducing the matrix:
[tex]V= <br /> \displaystyle\left[ {\begin{array}{*{20}{c}} <br /> 2&-1&2 \\ <br /> 0&5/2&-2 \\ <br /> \end{array}} \right][/tex]
Hence, you can see that columns 1 and 2 are a basis.
 
Last edited:
Well, if I reduce it to

[tex]V=<br /> \displaystyle\left[ {\begin{array}{*{20}{c}}<br /> 2&-1&2 \\<br /> 0&5/2&-2 \\<br /> \end{array}} \right][/tex]

Then I don't see what the next step should be.
 
Hi Robert
You have 3 2D vectors, v1, v2, v3. as you can see, none is perpendicular to any, but they can't form a basis since they are 3 and the dimensionality is 2.
So any two of them will form a basis.
So for instance, you could have a first basis (v1,v2) a second one (v2,v3) and a third one (v1,v3) and that would be the 3 ways in which you can later express x and y
So for instance, in the first base, you would want to express x in (v1,v2)
(and later y too, but first let's look at x)
How do you express x in (v1, V2) ?
x must be a linear combination of v1 and v2, so x=av1+bv2
x being (1,1) that would mean
av1+b2=(1,1), so a(2,3)+b(-1,1)=(1,1)
therefore you would just have to solve (2a-b, 3a+b)=(1,1)
I let you continue at this point

Cheers...
 
here are the answers

Screenshot2012-05-13at25038PM.png


by using v1 and v2 and setting up the matrix as follows

2 -1 1
3 1 1

I was able to get .4 -.2 which is the answer listed in 13

Using that technique I was not able to get the other two answers for x which are

-4/5 v + 7/5v + 2v

I don't see how I could even get values for three different v's when I'm only using two equations.
 

Similar threads

Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
4K