Expressing the Minkowski Field Tensor for Circular Currents

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Norman Albers
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Expression Tensor
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The Minkowski field tensor represents the flat space-time metric, typically expressed in Cartesian coordinates as diag(-1,1,1,1) or in spherical coordinates. When charge-carrying objects are introduced, the space-time metric transitions from Minkowski to a curved metric, necessitating the use of the Lorentzian space-time metric. Understanding this transition requires knowledge of general relativity (GR) and applied differential geometry, as well as the ability to solve the Einstein Field Equations for specific configurations, such as circular currents.

PREREQUISITES
  • General Relativity (GR) principles
  • Applied Differential Geometry
  • Einstein Field Equations
  • Cylindrical Coordinate Systems
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the Einstein Field Equations for circular currents
  • Learn about Lorentzian space-time metrics
  • Explore the implications of charge-carrying objects in GR
  • Review the mathematical foundations of differential geometry
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, students of general relativity, and anyone interested in the mathematical formulation of space-time metrics and their applications in theoretical physics.

Norman Albers
Messages
21
Reaction score
0
How do we express the Minkowski field tensor for circular currents?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Albers, though you're now banned, I'll take this opportunity to explain to you why your question doesn't even make sense.

The Minkowski 'field tensor' (which in itself of dubious terminology) is the flat space-time metric. While you can pick various coordinates to express this in, such as the diag(-1,1,1,1) cartesian form or the spherical form (or infinitely many others), they are all the same thing, flat space-time.

If you then introduce charge carrying objects (and thus some notion of energy) to the system, the space-time will become curved in some way. As such, the space-time metric will no longer be Minkowski but something else. Now if someone were wondering what the space-time metric was, they'd ask "What is the space-time metric for such a system?", or to more closely resemble your question, "What is the Lorentzian space-time metric?" Minkowski is, by it's very name, flat and empty (if you're working in GR).Anything in the space-time will disturb this.

This is why your question isn't particularly well phrased and as pointed out to you in a previous thread, it's somewhat of a sign you are attempting to jump in head first to a subject you know little about. As I told you many weeks ago, it's no skin off my nose if you don't bother to learn any kind of relativity or applied differential geometry, but it would VASTLY aid your understanding and abilities in doing whatever it is you're attempting to do if you did learn some.

Besides, if you're so confident about your amazing ability in relativity, why can't you solve the Einstein Field Equations for a circular current of some kind in the energy-momentum tensor? Or are you not sure how to write a metric in cylindrical coordinates ;)
 
AlphaNumeric said:
Albers, though you're now banned, I'll take this opportunity to explain to you why your question doesn't even make sense.
Why? Wouldn't it be better just to ignore him rather than give him the feeling that he'll get a response from someone whenever he posts non-sensical questions?

Pete
 
I'm a hopeless care for hoping he'll see the light and realize he'd advance so much faster if he actually opened a book and learned rather than trying to reinvent the wheel.
 
don quixote, the patron saint of teachers.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
9K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 34 ·
2
Replies
34
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K