External division of a line segment

  • Thread starter Thread starter Nero26
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Division Line
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the concept of external division of a line segment, specifically focusing on the division of segment AB at point C in the ratio m:n. Participants are exploring whether point C must always lie outside of segment AB and the implications of this on the ratios of the segments created.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants are questioning the necessity of point C being outside of segment AB for external division. There are discussions about the interpretation of ratios AC:BC and AC:AB, and whether C can divide AB externally if it is positioned between A and B.

Discussion Status

There is an ongoing exploration of the definitions and interpretations of external division, with participants providing different perspectives on the placement of point C and the corresponding ratios. Some participants are seeking clarification on the symmetry of points A and B in relation to point C.

Contextual Notes

Participants are referencing a link that may contain conflicting information regarding the position of point C and its role in dividing the segment. There is also mention of figures that may not accurately represent the described scenarios, leading to confusion about the correct interpretations.

Nero26
Messages
21
Reaction score
1
Suppose AB is a straight line segment. To divide the segment externally at point C in the ratio m:n, is it necessary for C to remain always outside of AB? I always thought C should be outside of AB, but the post in the link below confuses me
http://www.transtutors.com/math-homework-help/vectors/section-formula.aspx
Basically what is meant by external division of line segment by a point?
Can anyone please clarify me? Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I'm not sure what you are asking. In the link, the point C is clearly on the line segment between A and B.
The point O is external to the line segment.
 
I would guess it means that the distances AC, BC should be in the ratio m:n. If that represents AC:BC (as opposed to the other way around) then there are two solutions, one internal and one external.
 
uploadfromtaptalk1368360807272.jpg

Thanks for your response.
SteamKing said:
I'm not sure what you are asking. In the link, the point C is clearly on the line segment between A and B.
The point O is external to the line segment.
I'm trying to know if C is on line segment between A and B (fig 2) then can it divide AB externally or not? In the link it says C divides AB externally in the ratio AC:AB =m:n, is it correct or not?

Sorry for not stating clearly.
haruspex said:
I would guess it means that the distances AC, BC should be in the ratio m:n. If that represents AC:BC (as opposed to the other way around) then there are two solutions, one internal and one external.
In (fig 1) if C divides AB externally then which pair of segments should we consider AC:CB or AC :AB?
Or does this consideration of segments depend on given ratios? (for m+n:n, AC:CB for m+n:m, AC:AB)
 
Last edited:
Nero26 said:
In (fig 1) if C divides AB externally then which pair of segments should we consider AC:CB or AC :AB?
In the construct "C divides AB", A and B have symmetric roles, whereas C is different. Therefore it's AC:CB.
 
haruspex said:
In the construct "C divides AB", A and B have symmetric roles, whereas C is different. Therefore it's AC:CB.

What have you meant by "A and B have symmetric roles" here?
Please explain a little more. And what about the second fig, that if C is in between A and B on AB, then can it divide AB externally?
Sorry for bothering you. :confused:
 
Nero26 said:
What have you meant by "A and B have symmetric roles" here?
"C divides AB" is the same statement as "C divides BA". The roles that B and A play in the statement are symmetric, so the two are interchangeable. In the ratio expression AC:AB, B and A are not interchangeable; AC:AB is different from BC:BA. Therefore the correct interpretation is the ratio AC:BC.
what about the second fig, that if C is in between A and B on AB, then can it divide AB externally?
If you compare the vertex labels A, B and C with the vector labels a, b, c you will see that there's an error in the diagram.
 
Thanks a lot haruspex :)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
5K
  • · Replies 40 ·
2
Replies
40
Views
5K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
6K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
14
Views
3K