Extrema in 3D Problem: Finding Highest and Lowest Points on a Defined Surface

  • Thread starter Thread starter namu
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    3d Extrema
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on finding the highest and lowest points on the surface defined by the equation F(x,y,z) = 1/2(x+y)^2 + (y+z)^2 + (x+z)^2 = 9. The gradient of F is calculated as grad(F) = (3x+y+2z, x+3y+2z, 2x+2y+4z). The only critical point found is (0,0,0), which does not represent an extremum. The participants seek a more efficient method for determining extrema and projecting the surface onto the (x,y)-plane to find the shadow shape.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of multivariable calculus, specifically gradient and extrema.
  • Familiarity with the quadratic formula and its application in solving equations.
  • Knowledge of partial derivatives and their geometric interpretations.
  • Experience with projecting surfaces in three-dimensional space onto two-dimensional planes.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the method of Lagrange multipliers for finding extrema on constrained surfaces.
  • Learn about the implicit function theorem and its application in multivariable calculus.
  • Explore techniques for shadow projection of 3D surfaces onto 2D planes.
  • Review examples of using gradients to analyze surface behavior in optimization problems.
USEFUL FOR

Students and educators in mathematics, particularly those studying calculus and optimization, as well as professionals in fields requiring geometric analysis and surface modeling.

namu
Messages
32
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Consider the surface defined by

F(x,y,z)=1/2(x+y)^2+(y+z)^2+(x+z)^2=9

(a) Evaluate grad(F)

My Solution:
grad(F)=(3x+y+2z, x+3y+2z, 2x+2y+4z)

(b) Find the highest and lowest points on the surface (i.e. the points where z attains a maximum or minimum).

Problem:
So I can solve for z=g(x,y) using the quadratic formula and get a nasty expression (see attached) and
then go about finding the extrema, but this is ugly.

If I set each component of the gradient to zero, then the only solution is (x,y,z)=(0,0,0) which is NOT an
extrema (see attached image), rather there are two extrema.

How do I do this the "easy" way?

(c) The surface is illuminated from far above by light rays that are directed parallel to the z-axis. Find the
shape of its shadow in the plane below the surface parallel to the (x,y) coordinate plane.

Problem:

So now this is projecting the surface onto the (x,y)-plane. I have no idea how to do this.

Please help.
 

Attachments

  • Screen shot 2011-12-24 at 10.07.36 PM.png
    Screen shot 2011-12-24 at 10.07.36 PM.png
    24.2 KB · Views: 493
Physics news on Phys.org
namu said:

Homework Statement



Consider the surface defined by

F(x,y,z)=1/2(x+y)^2+(y+z)^2+(x+z)^2=9

(a) Evaluate grad(F)

My Solution:
grad(F)=(3x+y+2z, x+3y+2z, 2x+2y+4z)

(b) Find the highest and lowest points on the surface (i.e. the points where z attains a maximum or minimum).

Problem:
So I can solve for z=g(x,y) using the quadratic formula and get a nasty expression (see attached) and
then go about finding the extrema, but this is ugly.

If I set each component of the gradient to zero, then the only solution is (x,y,z)=(0,0,0) which is NOT an
extrema (see attached image), rather there are two extrema.

How do I do this the "easy" way?

(c) The surface is illuminated from far above by light rays that are directed parallel to the z-axis. Find the
shape of its shadow in the plane below the surface parallel to the (x,y) coordinate plane.

Problem:

So now this is projecting the surface onto the (x,y)-plane. I have no idea how to do this.

Please help.

Use the equation F(x,y,z) = 0 to evaluate z_x = \partial z / \partial x and z_y = \partial z / \partial y at a given point (x_0,y_0,z_0) on the surface; that is, you need to figure out \Delta z such that
F(x_0 + \Delta x, y_0 + \Delta y, z_0 + \Delta z) = 0. You don't need the exact\Delta z; you just need the ``first-order'' expression that is linear in \Delta x \mbox{ and } \Delta y. Then you need z_z = 0 and z_y = 0.

RGV
 

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K