1. Limited time only! Sign up for a free 30min personal tutor trial with Chegg Tutors
    Dismiss Notice
Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

I Extremum of thermodynamic potentials: confusion

  1. Mar 31, 2016 #1
    An alternative formulation of the second law is that the energy of the system [itex]U[/itex] is minimised if the temperature and entropy of the system are held constant.
    However, [tex] dU= TdS -pdV[/tex]
    which means that [itex]U[/itex] is presumably constant if the volume [itex]V[/itex] and the entropy [itex] S[/itex] are kept constant. How then can [itex]U[/itex] change so that it is minimised?
     
  2. jcsd
  3. Mar 31, 2016 #2

    andrewkirk

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper
    Gold Member

    The formulation doesn't say anything about keeping volume constant.
     
  4. Mar 31, 2016 #3
    Thanks for replying. I have seen two versions. One is in Steven Blundell's book where he derives the availability which satisfies
    [itex] dA= dU + p_0dV -T_0dS \leq 0 [/itex] where the subscripted variables are the reservoir ones. He then states that if [itex]V, S[/itex] are constant then [itex] dA = dU \leq 0[/itex] so that [itex] U[/itex] is minimised.

    The other version uses a completely different approach but crucially no mention is made of [itex] V[/itex] being constant as you say.
     
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Have something to add?
Draft saved Draft deleted



Similar Discussions: Extremum of thermodynamic potentials: confusion
Loading...