F(x)=f(2x)=3. Is it strictly a constant function?

  • Thread starter Thread starter vkash
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Constant Function
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the function defined by the equation f(x)=f(2x)=3, questioning whether it can be classified strictly as a constant function.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the implications of the function being equal to 3 for all x, with some suggesting that there could be other functions with similar properties. Others argue that the definition leads to the conclusion that it is indeed a constant function.

Discussion Status

The discussion includes various interpretations of the function's properties, with some participants providing guidance on the definition of constant functions. There is no explicit consensus, but multiple perspectives are being explored regarding the nature of the function.

Contextual Notes

Some participants question the assumption that other functions could share the same property without being constant, while others emphasize the continuity of the function around specific points.

vkash
Messages
316
Reaction score
1
f(x)=f(2x)=3. Is it strictly a constant function??

Homework Statement



f(x)=f(2x)=3.
can we say that it is constant. Nothing else..

Homework Equations



BRAIN>>>>

The Attempt at a Solution



f(1)=f(1/2)=f(1/4)=f(1/8)...f(1/∞)=f(0)=3
I think no there can be many functions having such property and constant function is one of them.
AM i correct..?
 
Physics news on Phys.org


If you are saying that f(x)= 3 for all x, yes, that is a constant function. There are NOT "many functions" such that f(x)= 3 for all x!
 


vkash said:

Homework Statement



f(x)=f(2x)=3[/color].
can we say that it is constant. Nothing else..

Homework Equations



BRAIN>>>>

The Attempt at a Solution



f(1)=f(1/2)=f(1/4)=f(1/8)...f(1/∞)=f(0)=3
I think no there can be many functions having such property and constant function is one of them.
AM i correct..?
Is it possible for a function that it is not a constant function and obey the above written property[/color]?
 


no, for example, take f(x) =(-6)*cos(x), and x = 2pi/3. What do you get?
 


oh, is it for all x? then, yes, provided that f is continuous around x=0.
 


lol, your problem is trivial:
[tex] \left( \forall x \right) f(x) = f(2x) = 3 \Rightarrow \left( \forall x\right) f(x) = 3[/tex]
This is by definition a constant function!
 


To start , Forget about f(2x) for a while... f(x) = 3 implies that irrespective of what values the variable 'x' can take, the function value is 3 only... so , f(x) = 3 is a constant function for all values of x...The set of values takne by '2x' is actually a subset of values taken by 'x'...
This means that f(2x) is a subset of values taken by f(x).So , f(2x) is also a constant function like f(x).
The answer is : yes , the function is strictly constant
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
20
Views
5K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K