Factor of Safety - Mechanics of Materials

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The forum discussion centers on calculating the minimum diameters required for tie rod (1) and double shear pins at points B, C, and D of a rigid beam ABC under a uniformly distributed load of 11 kN/m. The ultimate shear strength of the pin material is 640 MPa, while tie rod (1) has a yield strength of 350 MPa, and a factor of safety of 3.5 is mandated for all components. The calculations provided by the user initially yielded incorrect diameters, prompting a review of the force components and moment calculations. Key equations utilized include σ = F/A and τ = F/A, with adjustments for allowable stress based on the factor of safety.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of mechanics of materials, specifically shear and tensile stress.
  • Familiarity with calculating forces and moments in static equilibrium.
  • Knowledge of material properties, including yield strength and ultimate shear strength.
  • Proficiency in applying the factor of safety in engineering calculations.
NEXT STEPS
  • Review the principles of double shear connections in structural engineering.
  • Learn about calculating moments and forces in static systems.
  • Study the application of the factor of safety in mechanical design.
  • Explore advanced topics in material strength, including fatigue and failure analysis.
USEFUL FOR

Mechanical engineers, structural engineers, and students studying mechanics of materials who are involved in designing and analyzing load-bearing structures.

Triathlete
Messages
31
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Rigid beam ABC is supported as shown in the figure. The pin connections at B, C, and D are each double shear connections, and the ultimate shear strength of the pin material is 640 MPa. Tie rod (1) has a yield strength of 350 MPa. A uniformly distributed load of w = 11 kN/m is applied to the beam as shown. A factor of safety of 3.5 is required for all components. Assume a = 575 mm, b = 725 mm, c = 250 mm, and d = 525 mm.

Determine

(a) the minimum diameter required for tie rod (1).
(b) the minimum diameter required for the double shear pins at B and D.
(c) the minimum diameter required for the double shear pin at C.

http://edugen.wileyplus.com/edugen/courses/crs6838/art/qb/qu/ch0/13425408508040_6521478752676759.jpg

Homework Equations



σ = F/A
τ = F/A
σallow = σfailure/FS
τallow = τfailure/FS

The Attempt at a Solution



First I got the resultant force of w → 14.3 kN/m.
I started by finding the x and y components of F1(force on the rod), which were F1cos35.9 and F1sin35.9, respectively.
Then I summed the moments about C which gave me ΣM = (-14.3 kN/m)(13m) + (0.810F1)(0.25m) = (0.5864F1)(0.725)
⇒ F1 = 14.8 kN
Using σ ≤ σallow, I plugged in my values → 14809.4 N/π(d/2)2 ≤ 350 N/mm2/3.5
⇒ drod = 188.6 mm

14809.4 N/2π(d/2)2 ≤ 640 N/mm2/3.5
⇒dB,D = 51.6 mm

Then I summed the x and y forces to get the force at C, which was C = 13.2 kN

13242.3 N/2π(d/2)2 ≤ 640 N/mm2/3.5
⇒ d = 46.1 mm

All of my d values were wrong. I have recalculated and changed the signs on my forces and moments just to see if I did that wrong but I still can't get the right answer. Am I going about the problem the wrong way? I'm just not sure where I'm going wrong and I've been working on this and a similar problem for a couple days now to no avail.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Triathlete said:

Homework Statement



Rigid beam ABC is supported as shown in the figure. The pin connections at B, C, and D are each double shear connections, and the ultimate shear strength of the pin material is 640 MPa. Tie rod (1) has a yield strength of 350 MPa. A uniformly distributed load of w = 11 kN/m is applied to the beam as shown. A factor of safety of 3.5 is required for all components. Assume a = 575 mm, b = 725 mm, c = 250 mm, and d = 525 mm.

Determine

(a) the minimum diameter required for tie rod (1).
(b) the minimum diameter required for the double shear pins at B and D.
(c) the minimum diameter required for the double shear pin at C.

http://edugen.wileyplus.com/edugen/courses/crs6838/art/qb/qu/ch0/13425408508040_6521478752676759.jpg

Homework Equations



σ = F/A
τ = F/A
σallow = σfailure/FS
τallow = τfailure/FS


The Attempt at a Solution



First I got the resultant force of w → 14.3 kN/m.
You mean 14.3 kN
I started by finding the x and y components of F1(force on the rod), which were F1cos35.9 and F1sin35.9, respectively.
Then I summed the moments about C which gave me ΣM = (-14.3 kN/m)(13m) + (0.810F1)(0.25m) = (0.5864F1)(0.725)
⇒ F1 = 14.8 kN
Using σ ≤ σallow, I plugged in my values → 14809.4 N/π(d/2)2 ≤ 350 N/mm2/3.5
⇒ drod = 188.6 mm

14809.4 N/2π(d/2)2 ≤ 640 N/mm2/3.5
⇒dB,D = 51.6 mm

Then I summed the x and y forces to get the force at C, which was C = 13.2 kN

13242.3 N/2π(d/2)2 ≤ 640 N/mm2/3.5
⇒ d = 46.1 mm

All of my d values were wrong. I have recalculated and changed the signs on my forces and moments just to see if I did that wrong but I still can't get the right answer. Am I going about the problem the wrong way? I'm just not sure where I'm going wrong and I've been working on this and a similar problem for a couple days now to no avail.
You are getting a bit careless I think on math and signage, and using the wrong lever arm for the distributed load moment. The beam is 1.3 m long. Its resultant load acts at its cg when determining moments. The pins are in double shear.
 
PhanthomJay said:
You mean 14.3 kNYou are getting a bit careless I think on math and signage, and using the wrong lever arm for the distributed load moment. The beam is 1.3 m long. Its resultant load acts at its cg when determining moments. The pins are in double shear.

Oops I meant .65m not 1.3m. I calculated it using the 0.65 but I typed it wrong. I also thought I was calculating the stress in the pins correctly, by dividing the force by 2. Where else am I going wrong?
 
I will have to check your numbers I haven't done that ...when you say your force at C is the sum of the x and y components I hope you meant vector sum not algebraic sum. You have the 2 in there for dbl shear so that's ok , your approach is good I'll check math later
 
Your math is way off when calculating the diameters. Try again.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
30K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
6K