Factoring a 4th degree polynomial

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around factoring a fourth-degree polynomial, specifically focusing on the equation f''(t) = 0 = (-6t - 4t^4 + 2t^5) / (1 + 2t)^4. The original poster attempts to factor the polynomial and is seeking assistance with the second factor, t^4 - 2t^3 - 3 = 0, after finding that 2t = 0 leads to a straightforward solution.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the use of the rational root theorem to identify potential rational roots and question the application of guess-and-check methods. There are attempts to clarify the correct interpretation of the theorem and its implications for finding roots.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with the problem, offering insights into the rational root theorem and discussing the implications of the polynomial's behavior. There is a recognition of the need to check specific values for potential roots, but no consensus has been reached on the correct approach to factor the polynomial completely.

Contextual Notes

There are indications of confusion regarding the application of the rational root theorem, as well as issues with formatting in the original post that may have hindered clarity. The original poster expresses uncertainty about the nature of the roots, particularly in relation to the context of time in the problem.

mbrmbrg
Messages
486
Reaction score
2
I have the equation

[tex]f''(t) = 0 =\frac{\ -6t-4t^4+2t^5}{(1+2t)^4}[/tex]

which I factored to

[tex]0 =\frac{ (2t)(-3-2t^3+t^4)}{(1+2t)^4}[/tex]

and set

[tex]2t = 0[/tex] or [tex]t^4-2t^3-3 = 0[/tex]

How am I supposed to factor the second possibility for t? Using guess-and-check () with 0, 1, and -1, I found that t is probably a fraction between -1 and 1. And now I'm stuck for real, because no way am I guess-and-checking random fractions.

Help, please!
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
sorry, having latex trouble.

My second step should read 0=[(2t)(-3 - 2t^3 +t^4)]/(1+t^2)^4
but I don't think it does, and I can't figure out how to fix the code.
I'm blaming my computer display
 
All rational roots can be found by the rational root theorem, you don't have to check many:

http://planetmath.org/encyclopedia/RationalRootTheorem.html

In any case, when you tried to put in t=-1, you should have gotten 0, no? So you can reduce it to a cubic at least.

hmm, [tex]0 =\frac{\ (2t)(-3-2t^3+t^4)}{(1+2t)^4}[/tex]

odd, it's a cut and paste from yours.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
The latex doesn't work because you have an extra \ after \frac{
 
Last edited:
Ouch. Another good reason not to guess-and-check: my algebra tends to be better than my arithmetic. Oh, ouch.

Ummm, I looked at the rational root theorem, but I don't know if I'm using it right.
Does it say I have some root p/q, where my first coefficient (here 1) is divisible by p and my last coefficient (here -3) is divisible by q? So my answer is -1/3??
OK, apparently not, because that doesn't give me zero.

In either case, it looks like any root will require t to be negative, and in this case, t is time...

But now I'm curious how this rational root theorem works.
 
The rational root theorem:

Any rational root of a polynomial will be in the form p/q, where p is a factor of the constant term, and q is a factor of the leading coefficient (so in this case, p is +/-3, 1, and q is +/-1).

So your best bets would be to check 3, -3, 1, and -1
 
0rthodontist said:
The latex doesn't work because you have an extra \ after \frac{

That should just put a space in though? I don't think I changed anything in my cut and paste. Not important though.



mbrmbrg, you have the rational root theorem reversed, if p/q is a root then q divides your lead coefficient, here a 1, and p divides your constant coefficient, here -3. So you must have q=+ or -1 (so any rational root must also be an integer), and p=+/- 1 or 3. So to find all rational roots, just stick -1, 1, -3, and 3 into your equation. These are not guaranteed to be roots, but any rational root *must* be one of these.

You must have a positive real roots though. You polynomial is -3 at t=0 and greater than 0 when t is large and positive, so there's at least one root in there somewhere.
 
OK, got it now--thanks people!
 

Similar threads

Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
10
Views
2K