Factorising expectation values

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the factorization of expectation values in the context of momentum components for a 3-D harmonic oscillator. Participants explore the conditions under which expectation values can be expressed as products of individual expectation values and the implications of probability distribution factorization.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions the validity of factorizing expectation values of momentum components, specifically noting that < p12p22p32 > = < p12 > < p22 > < p32 > holds under certain conditions.
  • Another participant explains that factorization is true if the momentum components are uncorrelated and provides the condition for probability distribution factorization: P(𝑝)=P1(𝑝1) P2(𝑝2) P3(𝑝3).
  • A participant highlights that the factorization does not apply to < p12 >, as < p12 > ≠ < p1 > < p1 > due to the nature of expectation values.
  • Further clarification is sought on how to determine if the probability distribution factorizes and how this leads to the correctness of the initial equation.
  • One participant elaborates on the 3D harmonic oscillator's Hamiltonian and the independence of number operators, suggesting that the states can be expressed in a factorized form in momentum representation.
  • Another participant requests assistance in demonstrating the factorization result using Dirac notation for the ground-state average of the 3-D harmonic oscillator.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the conditions for factorization of expectation values, with some agreeing on the necessity of uncorrelated momentum components while others seek clarification on the implications and applications of this condition. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the specific demonstration of factorization using Dirac notation.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the importance of understanding the independence of momentum components and the role of probability distributions in determining the validity of factorization. There are unresolved questions regarding the application of Dirac notation in this context.

dyn
Messages
774
Reaction score
63
Hi.
I came across the following in the solution to a question I was looking , regarding expectation values of momentum in 3-D
< p12p22p32 > = < p12 > < p22 > <p32 >
ie. the expectation value has been factorised. I can't figure out why this is true and also why it doesn't apply to the following. eg. < p12 > ≠ < p1 > < p1 > ?
Any thoughts would be appreciated. Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It's only true if the different momentum components are uncorrelated, i.e., if the probability distribution factorizes;
$$P(\vec{p})=P_1(p_1) P_2(p_2) P_3(p_3).$$
Then it's very easy to see that the first equation is correct.

Of course, this does not hold for ##\langle p_1^2 \rangle##, because obviously
$$\langle p_1^2 \rangle=\int_{\mathbb{R}} \mathrm{d} p_1 p_1^2 P(p_1),$$
while
$$\langle p_1 \rangle^2=\left [\int_{\mathbb{R}} \mathrm{d} p_1 p_1 P(p_1) \right]^2 \neq \langle p_1^2 \rangle.$$
 
Thanks for your reply. The question actually concerned expectation values of the harmonic oscillator using ladder operators and bras and kets
vanhees71 said:
It's only true if the different momentum components are uncorrelated, i.e., if the probability distribution factorizes;
$$P(\vec{p})=P_1(p_1) P_2(p_2) P_3(p_3).$$
Then it's very easy to see that the first equation is correct.
How would I know that the probability distribution factorises and how does this lead to the first equation being correct ?
 
It's always good to explain the example you have in mind in detail, so that we can answer questions precisely.

If you have a 3D harmonic oscillator with the Hamiltonian
$$\hat{H}=\frac{\hat{\vec{p}}^2}{2m} + \frac{m}{2} \sum_{j=1}^3 \omega_j^2 \hat{x}_j^2,$$
obviously the number operators
$$\hat{N}_j=\hat{a}_{j}^{\dagger} \hat{a}_j$$
commute, and you can build an orthonormal basis of common eigenvectors (the Fock basis of three independent harmonic oscillators). Since each of the operators ##\hat{N}_j## only depend on ##\hat{x}_j## and ##\hat{p}_j## these states are obviously factorizing in the above described way, i.e., in the momentum representation you have
$$u_{N_1,N_2,N_3}(\vec{p})=u_{N_1}(p_1) u_{N_2}(p_2) u_{N_3}(p_3).$$
It's also clear that these are are complete set of energy eigenstates with eigenvalues
$$E_{N_1,N_2,N_3}=\sum_{j=1}^3 \frac{\hbar \omega_j}{2} (2N_j+1).$$
 
Thanks. The actual question is " calculate the following ground-state average for a 3-D harmonic oscillator < 0 | p12p22p32 | 0 > .
The answer then states the word " factorisation" and states < p12p22p32 > = <p12> <p22 > <p32> and then each expectation value is calculated in the usual way. I would just like to know how to show this result using Dirac notation
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
6K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K