Fake Moon Landing: Evidence, Flags & Remnants | Part 1-3

  • Thread starter Thread starter sneez
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Moon Moon landing
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The forum discussion centers on the debate surrounding the authenticity of the moon landing, with participants asserting that substantial evidence supports the landing's legitimacy. Key points include the assertion that telescopes cannot resolve small objects like the U.S. flags or landing modules on the moon due to distance limitations. Additionally, the discussion highlights the overwhelming evidence against conspiracy theories, emphasizing that claims of a faked moon landing have been thoroughly debunked. The consensus is that the moon landing remains one of the greatest engineering achievements of the 20th century.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of basic astronomy and telescope capabilities
  • Familiarity with the Apollo missions and their historical context
  • Knowledge of conspiracy theory analysis and debunking techniques
  • Awareness of the engineering principles behind space exploration
NEXT STEPS
  • Research NASA's planned missions for lunar photography and their outcomes
  • Study the engineering achievements of the Apollo program
  • Explore the techniques used in debunking conspiracy theories
  • Investigate the physics of visibility and resolution limits of telescopes
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for historians, aerospace engineers, educators, and anyone interested in the validation of historical events against conspiracy theories.

sneez
Messages
312
Reaction score
0
part 1
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=1913474363747128107
part 2
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-5737681932896358451
part 3

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-2265515730495966561

now, they produce huge amount of evidence that indeed moon landing happened in the studio...

my question appart can you dispute that evidence is: is there a possibility of telescope being able to see the U.S flags on the moon? That would be ultimate proof of the landing on the moon. Maybe the remnants of landing module would be more suitable object to view. is it possilble?

is there any such photos?

thanx
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Astronomy news on Phys.org
Telescopes aren't capable of resolving such small things at such tremendous distances. There was some mission planned by NASA however that, as one of its tasks, was to take up close up photos of the landing sight in a fly-by. It was suppose to happen this year or something, i forget what it was.

Also, i don't see how that could be "ultimate proof". The problem with such "proof" would be that the theory says the government lied and the proof against it could be easily countered by "the government is lying again". I think the ultimate proof is the fact that the evidence presented by conspiracy theorists is usually flat out wrong or the type that completely misses the point or tries to convince naive people of certain "problems" based on our everyday experience. Such an experience of course, doesn't accure inside a vacuum.
 
sneez said:
now, they produce huge amount of evidence that indeed moon landing happened in the studio...

First of all, this should be in the "Debunking" area. This has been covered several times before.

Second: I find it VERY offensive that anyone could think that the Moon landings were faked. This is the single greatest engineering feat of the 20th century, and yet some people which have little to no engineering knowledge think they can "prove" it never happened. All of the supposed "proof" of a conspiracy is total B.S., and has been disproved MANY times.

The fact is we landed on the moon, a great triumph for the United States (and mankind), and there is a huge amount of irrevocable evidence that it happened.

sneez said:
my question appart can you dispute that evidence

I won't even dignify this with an answer. All I will say is that I guarantee any and all "evidence" provided in the videos can be completely blown away. The videos are two hours of total crud.
 
Last edited:
ups sorry, question answered thank you all ...
 
sneez said:
now, they produce huge amount of evidence that indeed moon landing happened in the studio...
No, they don't. Maybe they think they have evidence, but I'd even venture to say that most such guys know they are full of crap but just spew it for the sake of making money. Most of this comes from a guy named Hoagland, who has spent enough time on it that he can't have completely ignored the debunking of his crap. He has to know he's wrong unless he is actually mentally ill.

Question answered by Penguino, thread closed.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 34 ·
2
Replies
34
Views
10K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 44 ·
2
Replies
44
Views
8K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K