Falling meter stick on a frictionless surface

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves a frictionless meter stick that is initially vertical and falls to the floor. Participants are exploring the dynamics of the stick's rotation and the calculations related to its angular velocity upon impact.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the rotation of the stick about its center of mass and the implications of it being frictionless. There are questions about the appropriate moment of inertia to use and how to define the height in the energy conservation equation.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided insights into the moment of inertia and energy equations, while others are questioning the assumptions about the pivot point and the height of the center of mass. There is a mix of interpretations regarding the setup and calculations, with no explicit consensus reached.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the problem specifies no friction at the pivot point and that the stick is allowed to fall without an initial push. There is also mention of the need to clarify the height in terms of the stick's length.

harralk
Messages
18
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


The question I'm working on says "A special, frictionless, thin meter stick is initially standing vertically on the floor. If the meter stick falls over, with what angular velocity will it hit the floor?"


Homework Equations


v_rot=rw, I=1/12mL^2, KE=1/2Iw^2


The Attempt at a Solution


I know that the stick is going to be spinning about its center of mass, assumably in the center of the stick. I also know that the cm will be falling straight down. When I set mgh=1/2Iw^2 I get stuck trying to solve for w without being given the mass of the stick.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The mass of the stick as at the geometric centre. The point where it touches the ground, that acts like a pivot. So yes you must use mgh=1/2 Iω2

But the 'I' in this case is not about the centre but about one end.
 
Thanks. But I forgot to add that the problem also says "assume that the end in contact with the floor experiences no friction and slips freely." I assumed they meant that the end on the floor would be moving in the opposite direction and with equal velocity as the top of the stick, hence the rotation about the cm. Do I need to use I=1/3mL^2?
 
And what about h? Do I set it equal to the cm, 1/2m?
 
harralk said:
Thanks. But I forgot to add that the problem also says "assume that the end in contact with the floor experiences no friction and slips freely." I assumed they meant that the end on the floor would be moving in the opposite direction and with equal velocity as the top of the stick, hence the rotation about the cm. Do I need to use I=1/3mL^2?


Well it still means it rotates about the end, slips freely and no friction means that in your energy equation, you don't need to account for friction.

So yes I=(1/3)mL2

so what in mgh=(1/2)Iω2, what does I change to? and what is h in terms of L? (the centre of mass is at the geometric centre of the stick)
 
ok, so substituting back in, I get w=sqrt(3g).

Thanks
 
harralk said:
ok, so substituting back in, I get w=sqrt(3g).

Thanks

Yep...I was almost going to tell you it should be ω=√(3g/L) when I remembered it was a metre stick :redface: . Anyhow, it's still correct.
 
FYI...In case anyone is reading this thread for help with their own homework, I thought about the problem one last time before I turned it in and changed my answer. After receiving my homework back, with the correct answer, the actual formula would be sqrt((24gh)/(l^2)). The way to think about it is since the stick is standing on a frictionless surface, once the top of the stick moves past vertical there is an x-component of its weight pushing the bottom sideways. Therefore, the stick rotates about its center (I=1/12MR^2) with the cm falling straight down. Be careful, because this problem didn't indicate an initial velocity for the top of the stick, which means that it was allowed to just fall over not pushed over.

Hope this helps clarify the wonderful world of physics.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
7K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
8K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
5K
Replies
3
Views
8K