Falling under gravity with decreasing r

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the problem of calculating the time it takes for an object to fall to the surface of the moon from a height of 1000 km, under the influence of gravity and without air resistance. Participants explore the mathematical formulation of the motion, specifically focusing on the nonlinear differential equation governing the object's acceleration as a function of distance.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant presents the equation of motion as $$\ddot{r}=\frac{-k}{r^2}$$ and discusses integrating this to find the time of fall.
  • Another participant provides a method involving energy conservation to derive the velocity at different points during the fall, suggesting that the inverse velocity relates to time.
  • A third participant introduces a rule relating acceleration, velocity, and position, leading to a derived expression for time that involves integrating a complex function.
  • There is mention of using Wolfram Alpha to assist in finding the integral necessary for calculating time, indicating the complexity of the problem.
  • One participant expresses uncertainty about potential mistakes in their calculations and suggests comparing the results to those obtained under constant acceleration for verification.
  • A later reply corrects a previous omission of a factor of \sqrt{2} in the time expression, indicating ongoing refinement of the calculations.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the final expression for the time of fall, and there are indications of uncertainty and potential errors in the calculations presented. Multiple approaches and methods are discussed without agreement on a definitive solution.

Contextual Notes

The discussion includes complex mathematical steps and assumptions that are not fully resolved, such as the dependence on the initial conditions and the specific form of the integral derived. There is also a lack of clarity on the accuracy of the derived expressions.

numberjuggler
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
If you drop an object from a great height with no air resistance. e.g. 1000 km above the moon. How long will it take to hit the surface?

(GM[itex]_{}1[/itex]M[itex]_{}2[/itex])/r[itex]^{}2[/itex] = M[itex]_{}2[/itex]a

r[itex]^{}..[/itex]=k/r[itex]^{}2[/itex]

Hmm this is my first post, not quite getting the symbols.

"The second derivative of r is equal to a constant divided by r squared"

So presumably you integrate that nonlinear differential equation. Somehow.

This is quite an obvious question. It seems like something Isaac Newton would have asked when he first discovered the equations of gravity. A really classic piece of physics. But I can't seem to calculate the answer or find it anywhere.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
$$\ddot{r}=\frac{-k}{r^2}$$
As code: $$\ddot{r}=\frac{-k}{r^2}$[/color]$

Or, in ASCII: d^2/dt^2 r = -k/r^2

The minus sign gives the usual convention that r is the (positive) radius and k is positive, too.

With energy conservation, you can calculate the velocity for every point of your motion. The inverse velocity is "time per length" - if you integrate that over the length of the motion, you get the total time.
 
Here is a rule which can be useful sometimes.
[itex]\ddot{r} = \frac{dv}{dt} = \frac{dv}{dr}\frac{dr}{dt} =\frac{dv}{dr} v[/itex]

Applying this to this situation:
[itex]\frac{dv}{dr} v = - \frac{k}{r^2}[/itex]

[itex]v \mathop{dv}= - \frac{k}{r^2}\mathop{dr}[/itex]

[itex]\frac{v^2}{2} = \frac{k}{r} + C_1[/itex]
We want that at [itex]r_0[/itex], the velocity is zero
[itex]\frac{v^2}{2} = \frac{k}{r} - \frac{k}{r_0}[/itex]

Next I used the fact that the velocity of the falling object will be negative.

[itex]v = \frac{dr}{dt} = - \sqrt{\frac{k}{r} - \frac{k}{r_0}}\;\;\;\; r < r_0[/itex]

[itex]-\int_{r_0}^{r_1} \frac{dr}{\sqrt{\frac{k}{r} - \frac{k}{r_0}}} = \int_0^t dt'\;\;\;\; r_1 < r_0[/itex]
So the time would be
[itex]t = -\frac{1}{\sqrt{k}}\int_{r_0}^{r_1}<br /> \frac{dr}{\sqrt{\frac{1}{r} - \frac{1}{r_0}}} \;\;\;\; r_1 < r_0[/itex]
Now comes the task of finding this integral.

[itex]x = \frac{1}{r} \;\;\;\; dx = -\frac{dr}{r^2}[/itex]

[itex]dr = -r^2 dx = -\frac{dx}{x^2}[/itex]

[itex]-\int \frac{dr}{\sqrt{\frac{1}{r} - \frac{1}{r_0}}} = \int \frac{dx}{x^2\sqrt{x - \frac{1}{r_0}}}[/itex]

Many steps omitted. Integral obtained using Wolfram Alpha.

[itex]\int \frac{dx}{x^2\sqrt{x - \frac{1}{r_0}}}[/itex][itex]= \frac{r_0<br /> \sqrt{x - \frac{1}{r_0}} }{ x} +r_0^{3/2}tan^{-1}\left(\sqrt{r_0}\sqrt{x - \frac{1}{r_0}}\right)[/itex]

substituting back for x:
[itex]= rr_0\sqrt{\frac{1}{r} - \frac{1}{r_0}} +r_0^{3/2}tan^{-1}\left(\sqrt{r_0}\sqrt{\frac{1}{r} - \frac{1}{r_0}}\right)[/itex]

note that this will in fact be zero at [itex]r = r_0[/itex] so we have

[itex]t = \frac{1}{\sqrt{k}} \left[ r_0r_1\sqrt{\frac{1}{r_1} - \frac{1}{r_0}} +r_0^{3/2}tan^{-1}\left(\sqrt{r_0}\sqrt{\frac{1}{r_1} - \frac{1}{r_0}}\right) \right] \;\;\;\; r_1 < r_0[/itex]

I am not sure that I have not made a mistake. One thing you could do to check this is to compare it to the falling time for constant acceleration and see if it is close for small distances.

[itex]t = \sqrt{\frac{2(r_0 - r_1)}{g}} = \sqrt{\frac{2r_0^2(r_0 - r_1)}{k}} \;\;\;\; r_1 < r_0[/itex]
 
Sorry, I was missing a [itex]\sqrt{2}[/itex].

[itex]t = \frac{1}{\sqrt{2k}} \left[ r_0r_1\sqrt{\frac{1}{r_1} - \frac{1}{r_0}} +r_0^{3/2}tan^{-1}\left(\sqrt{r_0}\sqrt{\frac{1}{r_1} - \frac{1}{r_0}}\right) \right] \;\;\;\; r_1 < r_0[/itex]
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
6K
  • · Replies 43 ·
2
Replies
43
Views
8K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
16K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K