MHB False Positive Rate of 1:1.5M Sampling Process

  • Thread starter Thread starter karamand
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Positive Rate
karamand
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
I have a sampling process of a very large population in which all items are of type A or type B. I have an analysis of the sampled objects which classifies type A and gives the wrong identification (a false positive) 1 in 1.5 million times.
I take a sample of 1 million and find 1 'hit' i.e classified as type A. What is the probability that it is a false positive?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
philpq said:
I have a sampling process of a very large population in which all items are of type A or type B. I have an analysis of the sampled objects which classifies type A and gives the wrong identification (a false positive) 1 in 1.5 million times.
I take a sample of 1 million and find 1 'hit' i.e classified as type A. What is the probability that it is a false positive?

Hi philpq! Welcome to MHB! :)

Without more information, any 'hit' of type A has a probability of $\frac{1}{1.5\cdot 10^6} \approx 6.7 \cdot 10^{-5}$ of being a false positive.
We will still know basically nothing about the other 999999 observations without more information.
 
I like Serena said:
Hi philpq! Welcome to MHB! :)

Without more information, any 'hit' of type A has a probability of $\frac{1}{1.5\cdot 10^6} \approx 6.7 \cdot 10^{-5}$ of being a false positive.
We will still know basically nothing about the other 999999 observations without more information.

Thanks for your help. I suppose the answer is obvious when I think about it. The sample size is irrelevant. The probability of anyone 'hit' being a false positive is 1 in 1.5 million as stated :)
 
Usually questions about false positives use Bayes' Theorem and for that you need a lot more information.

$$P(+|\text{ (actually negative)})=\frac{P(\text{(actually negative)}|+) \cdot P(+)}{P(\text{actually negative})}$$

In the above, $+$ means "reads positive". However, you already have this probability so the above isn't necessary to calculate. I'm just pointing out that these topics are very often related. Here is an example "false positive" question you can read on Wikipedia.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top