Falsified Resume Forces Resignation of MIT Dean

  • Thread starter Thread starter Ivan Seeking
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Forces Mit Resume
Join the discussion
Registration is free. Start your own thread to ask a follow-up.
Sign up Log in
56 replies · 16K views
Ivan Seeking
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Gold Member
Messages
8,252
Reaction score
2,666
The Massachusetts Institute of Technology's dean of admissions is resigning because she falsified her credentials, claiming she had degrees she had not earned. Marilee Jones had been an outspoken critic of the pressures young people face to build impressive resumes. [continued with audio report]
http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=9870469

It is hard to imagine that someone could pull this off at MIT. One would think that someone would have noticed something.
 
Physics news on Phys.org

Discussion

She worked there for 28 years. Not only did she con her way into the job, but she made a career out of it. Wow...

I have no idea how she got away with it for so long...does MIT not do some kind of checks with resumes??
 
It seems she doesn't even have an undergraduate degree. Maybe it wasn't a requirement when she joined the institute. Anyhow, it is amazing that she evaded her true academic background for nearly 3 decades. :smile:
 
Doesnt this show you that a degree isn't so so so relevant to the skills it needs to perform a job for 23 years.

Go on her, American dream and all that :smile:
 
Anttech said:
Doesnt this show you that a degree isn't so so so relevant to the skills it needs to perform a job for 23 years.

Go on her, American dream and all that :smile:

Wow, now that is a classical fallacious argument. I believe it is called arguing from the specific to the general. You simply cannot make that generalization based on the given information. Well at least anyone who cares about logical development, can't.
 
Amazing that this could happen at MIT. I work at a community college, and if a new hire's transcripts aren't in within 60 days of starting work, paychecks get withheld. I can't believe that we have a smarter system in place than MIT does. Dummies. :biggrin:
 
The person in question is co-authoring a book, "Less Stress, More Success: A New Approach to Guiding Your Teen Through College Admissions and Beyond," with Dr. Kenneth Ginsburg, an associate professor of pediatrics at the University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine.

"I misrepresented my academic degrees when I first applied to MIT 28 years ago, and did not have the courage to correct my résumé when I applied for my current job, or at any time since," she said in a statement issued through the university. "I am deeply sorry for this, and for disappointing so many in the MIT community and beyond who supported me, believed in me, and who have given me extraordinary opportunities."
http://www.iht.com/articles/2007/04/26/america/web0426-mit.php

I don't condone what she did and she has paid a price for that. On the other hand, she was apparently quite successful, and I tend to agree with her position on college admissions.

Other than mentioning that she doesn't have degrees, I have not read how it is that this came to light. Apparently there was an investigation into her credentials.

"CNN has a report that the Dean of Admissions at MIT has resigned her post after admitting to lying about her academic record. 'Marilee Jones, who joined the staff of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) in 1979 to lead the recruitment of women at the university, stepped down from her post after admitting that she had misrepresented her academic degrees to the institute, according to a statement posted on MIT's Web site.' The school had recently received information about her credentials and the subsequent investigation uncovered the misrepresentations. Question is, why did it take 28 years?"
http://slashdot.org/articles/07/04/28/1929251.shtml

Jones was named dean of admissions at MIT in 1997 and received MIT's highest award for administrators, the "MIT Excellence Award for Leading Change." She was also the 2006 winner of the "Gordon Y Billard Award" given "for special service of outstanding merit" performed for the school.
http://www.cnn.com/2007/WORLD/americas/04/27/mit.dean/index.html
 
Astronuc said:
I don't condone what she did and she has paid a price for that.

No, she hasnt. MIT should sue her for the wages she has received adjusted by degree-based vs non-degree based salary. This is a fraud not only from the private organization's perspective but also collectively from all the students that have been denied admission solely by her signature.

How would you like to go to your doctor's office for 10 years, be diagnosed with bipolar syndrome, prescribed bunch of medications (lets go with Depakote for bipolar disorder) - lose hair as a direct result of that medication and have a severe impact of such hair loss on your sex appeal, your job promotions, and overall your mental state? On top of that to find out that the doctor is not really a doctor but a guy who dropped out of High School and came up with a clever plan.

[PLAIN said:
http://www.thecrimson.com/article.aspx?ref=518567][/PLAIN]
Profiles of Jones in the New York Times and Boston Globe last year said she earned bachelor’s and master’s degrees in chemistry and biology from RPI. A short biography on the Web site of the National Association of College Admission Counseling referred to her as “Dr. Marilee Jones, Ph.D.” and said she had degrees in biology and chemistry from RPI and Albany Medical, without specifying further. She was scheduled to speak at the association’s annual conference in September.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
No, she hasnt.
She had to resign and her reputation is tarnished, not to mention the humiliation.

Marilee Jones did not start out as Dean of Admissions. Ostensibly, she worked up to that position. Presumably, she was one of many considered and got the job as Dean, not based on degree, but the 18 years of prior performance.

I am not sure I'd agree with the doctor analogy, since I tend to investigate things like medications. I don't think anyone has challenged her competence - just her integrity.

As I mentioned, I do not condone her behavior.
 
cronxeh,

Apparently she was doing her job well, though. If anything, this shows that degrees are not what are important for a job such as this.
 
I saw a poll on Sky News a while ago wherein around 20% of professional people admitted to falsifying or seriously exagerating their qualifications and/or their experience in order to gain a position. It struck me at the time how little verification seems to be done at the interview stage.

Following Marilee Jones' high profile exposure I wouldn't be surprised to see a rush of such incidents as other institutions perform background checks on their staff.

Edit found a link related to it
One In Five Lie On CV
Updated: 12:07, Monday October 09, 2006

One in five jobseekers lie on their CV, with fibs including false academic qualifications, new research has shown.

A study of 3,700 job applications showed a similar number leave out court appearances or convictions.

Stretching the truth...?The Risk Advisory Group (RAG) said its study suggested an increasing number of people are lying in their job applications.
http://news.sky.com/skynews/article/0,,30400-13546059,00.html

There have been several high profile cases of fraud in the national health service in the UK e.g.
Omid Amidi Mazahri was sentenced to two years imprisonment on 3 March 2005 at Southwark Crown Court for impersonating a dentist and undertaking dental work at surgeries across South London. Between March 2002 and June 2003 it is estimated that Mr Amidi-Mazahri treated at least 600 patients at his partner's - Ms Mojhan Azari - surgeries in Norbury and Tulse Hill. She was jailed for 12 months for falsifying claims and allowing Mr Amidi-Mazahri to work at her surgeries.
and
Barian Baluchi, an Iranian-born asylum seeker, who was sentenced to 10 years imprisonment on Wednesday 26 January 2005 at Middlesex Guildhall Crown Court for impersonating a doctor and defrauding the taxpayer and charities of and estimated £1.2 million. The sentence followed a joint-investigation by the NHS Counter Fraud Service and the Metropolitan Police.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Such a shame, she's obviously very qualified and seems truly devoted to her job.
 
I agree that one shouldn't falsify one's CV... but I also have concern about the environment in which she felt forced to do so... as stated, she has been "an outspoken critic of the pressures young people face to build impressive resumes." Perhaps given her record of sucess, she should have been more of a chance to explain herself, issue an apology, and have some lesser reprimand take place. Would MIT expel a student for lying about some extracurricular leadership?
 
physics girl phd said:
I agree that one shouldn't falsify one's CV... but I also have concern about the environment in which she felt forced to do so... as stated, she has been "an outspoken critic of the pressures young people face to build impressive resumes." Perhaps given her record of sucess, she should have been more of a chance to explain herself, issue an apology, and have some lesser reprimand take place. Would MIT expel a student for lying about some extracurricular leadership?

Just an FYI. In this case it's quite a bit more than falsification of some arcane detail on a resume or CV. In this case she lied about having an undergraduate and medical degree. She claimed to have attended two undergraduate institutions, and one medical college. It turns out that one of the undergraduate instititions has a record of her taking some classes as a non-matriculated student, but never completing a degree program. The other undergraduate school, and the medical college, don't have any record of her at all.
 
Integral said:
Wow, now that is a classical fallacious argument. I believe it is called arguing from the specific to the general. You simply cannot make that generalization based on the given information. Well at least anyone who cares about logical development, can't.
Intergral,
for it to be a classical fallacious argument, I should have been meaning to deceive you, which is not the case at all. I can't quiet understand how it is a logical fallacy either. Generalizing is just that, it doesn't go hand in hand with an error in logic.


The point I was trying to make is that this is an example where the lack of a degree did not get in the way of her being able to adequately (more than adequately?) perform her function for 23 years. Which does show that degree's are not so important to performing a function, in this case.

Now to enforce that, and widen the argument in my industry most of the people I work with have a vast array of differing degrees, most of which are not in IT, however that is the area I work in. Some of the best Engineers in fact don't have any degree. There lack of IT degree's doesn't hamper them being good at their job.
 
As someone who lives and drives in NYC everyday, I can tell you why this sort of thing really bothers me. Imagine 3 car lanes, and only the right one can (according to the traffic signs) exit into the highway. You are in that lane, slowly progressing forward, waiting your turn just like a car behind you and in front of you to exit and proceed onto your destination. You've paid your dues and by all probabilities and laws of society and physics you are sure to get off after 10 or so cars in front of you do so. Now the NYC reality: every M**F*** on the middle and left lane tries to cut you off and merge into the right lane creating a traffic situation, the entire right lane you are in now comes to a hault and the serene order is disrupted. You are now forced to deal with the queuing theory and your exit time has been considerable increased. You are MAD AS HELL because the just system doesn't work. Its anarchy.

Tell me - why should someone who was 2 minutes behind you now be ahead of you just because they break a rule and cause delays for others? This woman is no better - and if she was 'good' at her job imagine how much better someone else would've been who was meant for that job. Someone more qualified, who would've had a BETTER outcome for MIT in the long run. Remember that just because someone is good doesn't mean they are the best. And it certainly doesn't mean that they are not in fact the worst. This woman could in fact be THE worst person for this particular job. Hell, what if I had her job - I guarantee you I would've done a better job - yet I don't want that job, but I'm sure there are those who are more deserving and would be more fit for the job and this is not a grocery shop we are talking about... *puts on 300 "this is Sparta!" mood * -- THIS IS MIT! The god damned BEST (supposedly) institution in these United States. Who does she think she is to tamper with such noble causes as highest education? Why, this woman could've single handedly screwed this entire country with her blatant disregard for idealistic principles and lies and deceits she used to get her ways.

I despise people like her.
 
cronxeh said:
This woman is no better - and if she was 'good' at her job imagine how much better someone else would've been who was meant for that job. Someone more qualified, who would've had a BETTER outcome for MIT in the long run. Remember that just because someone is good doesn't mean they are the best. And it certainly doesn't mean that they are not in fact the worst. This woman could in fact be THE worst person for this particular job.
Actually she was outstanding in this job and recognized quite highly for it. So much for your rant. You should check things out before you make wild, baseless accusations, I'm surprised at you cronxeh.

Jones was named dean of admissions at MIT in 1997 and received MIT's highest award for administrators, the "MIT Excellence Award for Leading Change." She was also the 2006 winner of the "Gordon Y Billard Award" given "for special service of outstanding merit" performed for the school.
http://www.cnn.com/2007/WORLD/americas/04/27/mit.dean/index.html
 
Last edited:
Well, she shouldn't have lied 28 years ago, true. But given her outstanding performance, i am quite surprise that MIT is not gracious enough to settle it all with a resignation, but to the extend of suing her for her wages? Unsympathetic people.
 
Clay said MIT now checks credentials of new hires but did not generally do so when Jones first applied to work there. The first job she applied for, as an administrative assistant, did not require a college degree, but Clay said Jones claimed to have one. He said she did not correct that claim during her appointment process as dean in 1997.
http://www.dailyadvance.com/nation/content/shared-gen/ap/National/MIT_Dean.html

I don't believe MIT is planning on suing Ms. Jones for her wages - unless I missed something. If that were the case, then MIT would have to consider refunding all tuition based on their inability to appropriately screen administration and faculty. :biggrin:

And MIT is not necessarily the best in all areas - although they and others might like to think so.

I've actually seen better at other places in certain areas.
 
physics girl phd said:
I agree that one shouldn't falsify one's CV... but I also have concern about the environment in which she felt forced to do so... as stated, she has been "an outspoken critic of the pressures young people face to build impressive resumes."
'Competition is stressful, so I lied'? You can't be serious? And now she's writing a book essentially trying to justify her cheating? That's a joke. What kind of message does that send?

Would MIT expel a student for lying about some extracurricular leadership?
I would think that MIT would expel a student if they found out he/she falsified a high school transcript, yes.

Fair, appropriate accountability in a situation like this is to not allow someone to be rewarded for cheating. You guys are missing the point about performance: It doesn't matter that she was good at her job, in a competitive environment, odds are a bunch of people who applied would have been near-equally as good and perhaps even better. She got something she didn't deserve by lying. That's pretty much the definition of fraud. If people do that in sports, they get stripped of their accomplishments because it renders the accomplishments meaningless.
 
Last edited:
Actually, MIT probably has no choice than to fire her and sue her for back pay. If they didn't, then every other job applicant who was rejected for not having those credentials, or every employee who is receiving lower pay scales for the same or better credentials (actual, not faked) could sue them for not receiving fair wages. When certain positions and pay scales are based on degrees, and you don't have those degrees, then yes, they should be reimbursed for it.
 
Moonbear said:
Actually, MIT probably has no choice than to fire her and sue her for back pay. If they didn't, then every other job applicant who was rejected for not having those credentials, or every employee who is receiving lower pay scales for the same or better credentials (actual, not faked) could sue them for not receiving fair wages. When certain positions and pay scales are based on degrees, and you don't have those degrees, then yes, they should be reimbursed for it.
In her case though, she wasn't promoted to Dean based on the ancient degrees, but on her actual performance. The problem is that the old degrees were still on her resume because she was afraid if she deleted them it would raise questions. Remember the old saying "Oh what a tangled web we weave when first we practice to deceive". MIT can't bend the rules for her because they would be obligated to bend them for everyone. And you're probably right that in an educational environment salary is probably commensurate with degrees, even if those degrees were from 40 years ago.
 
Last edited:
Evo said:
In her case though, she wasn't promoted to Dean based on the ancient degrees, but on her actual performance.
Dean searches always require specified degrees plus experience. If she didn't have the degree, she should have never been considered for the position in the first place. That is a pretty big deal, especially for whoever was the "second runner up" in that search who did not get the job. People don't just get "promoted" to Dean. A search is always conducted, she probably just applied as an internal candidate. Hmm...I haven't been asked to provide a transcript for any position since my post-doc days, so I wonder if universities will start requiring those again for all applicants in the aftermath of this incident.

This would be considered a major breach of academic integrity to have falsified her CV and degrees earned to obtain a job. If she was so embarrassed by her past, perhaps she should not have applied for the dean's position in the first place.
 
I'm not sure what I think about this one. Maybe I'm with the minority that thinks it is ok. I despise credentialism, although it may be an easier way to pick good people out of a massive group (assuming no body had to lie). But it also doesn't seem right that she did that. That's lying on your resume, academic or not.
 
Moonbear said:
Actually, MIT probably has no choice than to fire her.
Agreed and for the reason you gave.
Moonbear said:
and sue her for back pay.
I don't see this part.
 
The issue is that she lied on her resume. If she had told the truth on her resume, and still was promoted, and then it came out that the promotion was inappropriate, surely the outcome would have been much different.
 
cronxeh said:
As someone who lives and drives in NYC everyday, I can tell you why this sort of thing really bothers me. Imagine 3 car lanes, and only the right one can (according to the traffic signs) exit into the highway. You are in that lane, slowly progressing forward, waiting your turn just like a car behind you and in front of you to exit and proceed onto your destination. You've paid your dues and by all probabilities and laws of society and physics you are sure to get off after 10 or so cars in front of you do so. Now the NYC reality: every M**F*** on the middle and left lane tries to cut you off and merge into the right lane creating a traffic situation, the entire right lane you are in now comes to a hault and the serene order is disrupted. You are now forced to deal with the queuing theory and your exit time has been considerable increased. You are MAD AS HELL because the just system doesn't work. Its anarchy.

Tell me - why should someone who was 2 minutes behind you now be ahead of you just because they break a rule and cause delays for others? This woman is no better - and if she was 'good' at her job imagine how much better someone else would've been who was meant for that job. Someone more qualified, who would've had a BETTER outcome for MIT in the long run. Remember that just because someone is good doesn't mean they are the best. And it certainly doesn't mean that they are not in fact the worst. This woman could in fact be THE worst person for this particular job. Hell, what if I had her job - I guarantee you I would've done a better job - yet I don't want that job, but I'm sure there are those who are more deserving and would be more fit for the job and this is not a grocery shop we are talking about... *puts on 300 "this is Sparta!" mood * -- THIS IS MIT! The god damned BEST (supposedly) institution in these United States. Who does she think she is to tamper with such noble causes as highest education? Why, this woman could've single handedly screwed this entire country with her blatant disregard for idealistic principles and lies and deceits she used to get her ways.

I despise people like her.
You obviously arent fit for living in a big city. :smile: Man if you get stressed like that at traffic you are going to die young.
 
It seems like lately people are using entirely fake diplomas.

A high-ranking career official in the Homeland Security Department apparently obtained her doctorate from a Wyoming diploma mill.

http://www.gcn.com/online/vol1_no1/22294-1.html


edit:
In some cases the federal government had picked up the tab for fake degrees.

The audit agency report cited the cases of five unnamed federal employees who had received degrees from unaccredited schools: three from the National Nuclear Safety Agency, one from the Transportation Department and one from the Homeland Security Department. The facts GAO presented about the DHS official, whom it identified as Employee No. 5, matched the career of Laura Callahan, a senior director in the department's CIO office who recently resigned after being on paid leave following the disclosure by Washington Technology and Government Computer News that her degrees came from a diploma mill.

http://www.washingtontechnology.com/online/1_1/23510-1.html
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Hamilton University, according to an Internet search, is located in Evanston, Wyo. It is affiliated with and supported by Faith in the Order of Nature Fellowship Church, also in Evanston. The state of Wyoming does not license Hamilton because it claims a religious exemption. Oregon has identified Hamilton University as a diploma mill unaccredited by any organization recognized by the U.S. Department of Education.
:smile: I wonder if Callahan ever set foot in Wyoming - or did she do course work by mail or on-line?

Hamilton University’s enrollment application and enrollment invitation spell out the simple requirements for students who wish to obtain a Ph.D.

$3,600, payable up front by bank draft or personal check only. Hamilton does not accept credit cards.

Completing one course at home on “personal, business and professional ethics.” Hamilton provides the course workbook, and the student must complete the open-book examination that is included. The school’s materials state the course and test require an average of five to eight hours to complete.

Writing one paper relevant to the area in which the Ph.D. is being sought. The minimum length for the paper is 2,000 words, or roughly four pages, and will “be referred to as a dissertation,” the materials say.