Faraday's Nested Sphere Experiment

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter BlackMelon
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Experiment Sphere
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around Faraday's Nested Sphere Experiment, focusing on the behavior of electric fields in the presence of charges and the application of Gauss's law. Participants explore the implications of grounding a charged outer shell and the resulting electric field configurations.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions why the equations in the experiment only consider charge +Q and not -Q, suggesting that both charges should be included when calculating the electric field at a point.
  • Another participant explains that the flux density is radially outward and that the presence of -Q inside the outer shell is necessary to neutralize the field within the conductor.
  • A participant presents two situations regarding the electric field: one with positive charges on the outer shell and another with only charge +Q, questioning if the electric field in the first situation is greater than in the second.
  • One participant argues for a more rigorous analysis using electrostatic Maxwell equations, asserting that the electric field should resemble a Coulomb field and discussing the implications of grounding the outer sphere.
  • There is a mention of the total charge on the outer shell needing to remain zero before and after grounding, leading to a discussion about charge distribution on the inner and outer surfaces.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the necessity of including both charges in the electric field calculations, and there is no consensus on the implications of grounding the outer shell or the resulting electric field configurations.

Contextual Notes

Some participants rely on assumptions about charge distributions and the effects of grounding that may not be explicitly stated. The discussion includes various interpretations of Gauss's law and the behavior of electric fields in spherical symmetry.

BlackMelon
Messages
43
Reaction score
7
Hi there!

I have a question about the Faraday's Nested Sphere Experiment, please see the attached pdf. I wonder why equation (1) and the electric field's equation ( coming after (1) ) consider only the charge Q. Why there aren't charge -Q in the equation?

Ps. I'm thinking about point charges. When you have two charges: +Q and -Q, and you want to find the electric field at point x. You need to put both +Q and -Q in an equation:
1681479342482.png


BlackMelon
 

Attachments

Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Because the flux density is radially outward for both (via Gauss's law) . For the outer shell this is into the local surface of the outer shell.
It is true that there needs to be -Q on the inside of the outer shell to kill the field inside the outer conductor. Thus +Q is left on the outside of the outer conductor before it is grounded.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: vanhees71
About the Gauss's law, could you take a look at the file inside the link below?

SITUATION 1:
There were positive charges at the outer surface of the outer shell. As we connect the ground, the outer surface becomes neutral.
Afterwards, I define the gaussian surface (dotted line). The magnitude of electric field at each point normal to the gaussian surface is E1.

SITUATION2:
This experiment has only the same charge +Q and the same gaussian surface. No other instruments.
The magnitude of electric field is E2.

Is E1 > E2?
From the bottom most picture, I inspect the two negative charges (blue one and green one) and their effects on the Gaussian surface (red circle). At x, the blue one will add up with the field from the positive charge. The green one will deduct the field, but its effect is lesser, since it is far away from x. So in total, the field coming out of x will be more than that in the situation 2. Am I correct?

BlackMelon

The attached picture resolution is not good. Take this link:
https://www.mediafire.com/file/npoqe0qaekziezs/Gaussian1.jpg/file
 
Last edited:
I don't know, if it is so helpful to use such hand-waving arguments. Rather one should analyze the problem, using the electrostatic Maxwell equations. Since the problem is spherically symmetric, it's clear that the em. field everywhere has the form of a Coulomb field
$$\vec{E}=\frac{q}{4 \pi \epsilon_0 r^3} \vec{r}.$$
For the grounded outer sphere you have the outer surface at equal potential ##0##, and thus outside the outer surface the field is ##0##. This implies that at the inner surface of the outer spherical shell must be a total charge ##-Q##.

If you have the situation before grounding the outer sphere, then the total charge on both its inner and outer surface must be 0, because it was 0 before putting it around the inner sphere, and no net-charge has been in any way transported from or to the outer sphere. This is achieved by simply putting a total charge ##+Q## on the outer surface of the outer shell compared to the situation when the outer sphere is grounded. Thus in this case you have outside again the Coulomb field with ##q=+Q##.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: BlackMelon

Similar threads

  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
688
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
855
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
850
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
848