The discussion revolves around proposed experiments and thought experiments related to the concept of faster-than-light (FTL) speeds, exploring various scenarios and interpretations within the context of physics. Participants examine the implications of visual phenomena, such as laser pointers and moving objects, and how they might suggest FTL motion, while also addressing the limitations and conditions of these claims.
Participants express a variety of viewpoints, with some agreeing on the mechanics of visual phenomena and others contesting the interpretations of FTL motion. The discussion remains unresolved, with multiple competing views on the implications of the proposed experiments and thought experiments.
Some claims rely on specific assumptions about the nature of light and observation, and there are unresolved mathematical considerations regarding the scenarios presented. The discussion also highlights the distinction between perceived motion and actual physical movement.
pallidin said:OK, but if that is true, than I can transmit data FTL through vertex manipulation, so I question it's reality. Allow me to explain:
Using the 2 inclinded jaws as you described, the angle of separation(in this case) will cause a non-mass vertex movement to go FTL. Correct?
I can easily create sensors that determine whether or not a vertex exists at any given point. Agreed?
So, if I put a sensor at the beginning of the jaws to indicate vertex starting, and one at the end to indicate vertex arrival, the second sensor should "trigger" a vetex moment faster than C. Right?
With that I manipulate the jaws in Morse Code to transmit data FTL.