- #1

pyroknife

- 613

- 3

The only way I know is to set up the matrix with the 4x4 matrix and the identity matrix and row reduce. But that takes forever sometimes.

You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.

You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.

You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.

- Thread starter pyroknife
- Start date

- #1

pyroknife

- 613

- 3

The only way I know is to set up the matrix with the 4x4 matrix and the identity matrix and row reduce. But that takes forever sometimes.

- #2

gabbagabbahey

Homework Helper

Gold Member

- 5,002

- 7

The only way I know is to set up the matrix with the 4x4 matrix and the identity matrix and row reduce. But that takes forever sometimes.

It is often (but not always) faster to use the determinant and the adjugate matrix.

- #3

Ray Vickson

Science Advisor

Homework Helper

Dearly Missed

- 10,706

- 1,722

It is often (but not always) faster to use the determinant and the adjugate matrix.

It is hardly ever faster to use determinants. You would need to calculate 16 determinants, each of which is 3x3, so each involves 9 three-factor multiplications, plus keeping track of signs and worrying about roundoff error effects. Direct row-reduction is likely much faster in the vast majority of cases. And, yes, it can involve a lot of work, but that's life!

RGV

- #4

HallsofIvy

Science Advisor

Homework Helper

- 43,021

- 971

Personally, I've always felt that row-reducing was faster than finding the determinant.

Share:

- Last Post

- Replies
- 2

- Views
- 156

- Replies
- 3

- Views
- 546

- Replies
- 9

- Views
- 362

- Replies
- 14

- Views
- 599

- Replies
- 4

- Views
- 141

- Last Post

- Replies
- 1

- Views
- 316

- Replies
- 11

- Views
- 545

- Replies
- 6

- Views
- 313

- Replies
- 2

- Views
- 1K

- Replies
- 10

- Views
- 466