Felix Baumgartner Jumped From.the Moon?

  • Thread starter Thread starter EBENEZR
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Moon
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion highlights a significant gap in public understanding of space travel, particularly regarding the misconception that humans have consistently advanced beyond the Moon since the Apollo missions. It reveals that a majority of students surveyed believed humans had traveled farther than the Moon, with only 11% correctly identifying low Earth orbit as the current limit of human space travel. The conversation also critiques the education system's failure to adequately inform students about unmanned rocket launches and the realities of space exploration, emphasizing the need for improved public education on these topics.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of basic space travel concepts, including low Earth orbit (LEO).
  • Familiarity with unmanned space missions and their significance.
  • Knowledge of historical space exploration milestones, particularly the Apollo missions.
  • Awareness of the International Space Station's role in current space research.
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the current capabilities and missions of unmanned spacecraft.
  • Explore the history and objectives of the Apollo program and its impact on space exploration.
  • Learn about the International Space Station and its scientific contributions to space research.
  • Investigate advancements in nuclear propulsion systems for future Mars missions.
USEFUL FOR

Students, educators, space enthusiasts, and anyone interested in understanding the realities of space exploration and the misconceptions surrounding it.

EBENEZR
Messages
31
Reaction score
1
At least, that's what one individual would have us think:

MzaI2K3RJEqlvlxpXml36A2.jpg


So at what point did the education system really go wrong?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If we could have went to the moon in a balloon, why would we have spent millions to send people there on a rocketship?
 
The other day I was talking about this to some friends, all of us are graduates and one (who I consider particularly intelligent) was shocked to find out that the majority of rocket launches are unmanned. She was further shocked to learn that astronauts haven't been to other planets and don't do so regularly.

When it comes to space especially it ceases to surprise me that the average person is uninformed, not just because of the education system and the understandable lack of interest in space but because the narrative of space travel in western culture is such that most people just assume we've been getting bigger and better since the moon landings. After all, we're clearly going to be living in space in the future...right??

An interesting blog post on this issue by a lecturer who raised this with his students
http://physics.ucsd.edu/do-the-math/2011/10/why-not-space/
 
Jimminy Christmas!

"Where is New Mexico?" :rolleyes:
 
Ryan_m_b said:
An interesting blog post on this issue by a lecturer who raised this with his students
http://physics.ucsd.edu/do-the-math/2011/10/why-not-space/

I took the picture from this blog post and included it as part of a trivia night I occasionally host at a local student bar, basically asking the same question Murphy did.

None of the groups answered correctly, and its mostly international graduate students.
 
Ryan_m_b said:
The other day I was talking about this to some friends, all of us are graduates and one (who I consider particularly intelligent) was shocked to find out that the majority of rocket launches are unmanned. She was further shocked to learn that astronauts haven't been to other planets and don't do so regularly.

When it comes to space especially it ceases to surprise me that the average person is uninformed, not just because of the education system and the understandable lack of interest in space but because the narrative of space travel in western culture is such that most people just assume we've been getting bigger and better since the moon landings. After all, we're clearly going to be living in space in the future...right??

An interesting blog post on this issue by a lecturer who raised this with his students
http://physics.ucsd.edu/do-the-math/2011/10/why-not-space/

Out of a total of 109 students responding (one group in 2006, another in 2010), only 11% got the right answer: low Earth orbit. 52% thought humans had been as far as the Moon since the 1980′s, and 20% thought we had been farther than the Moon. Some were indignant on learning the truth: “What do we use the space shuttle for, if not to go to the Moon?!” I can only guess that some students imagined the International Space Station as a remote outpost, certainly beyond the Moon, and likely strategically located next to a wormhole. How disappointing it must be to learn that it merely hugs the globe
That's sad and worrisome.

Back in the 1980's, I was one of a group of nuclear engineering grad students who were part of a USRA/NASA program looking at nuclear propulsion systems for missions to Mars and power plants for the Moon or Mars. Back then the objective was to get my generation interacting with those from the 1950s-1970s who developed such technology, and hopefully transfer the technology, and if possible enhance the technology based on the state-of-the-art in the mid 1980s (particular with access to greater computational resources). At the time, many were retired and some had already died.

I also watched as ISS was downsized (while the budget skyrocketed) and then the Challenger disaster.

It's one matter to go from LEO to the moon or Mars. It's quite another matter to deliver the necessary infrastructure (mass) from the Earth's surface to LEO.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
4K
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
437
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K