- #151
moshek
- 265
- 0
ComputerGeek said:
Please explain to me why ?
Fermat’s Last Theorem: A one-operation proof
Click For Summary
Discussion Overview
The discussion revolves around a proposed elementary proof of Fermat's Last Theorem (FLT), which claims to simplify the understanding of the theorem through specific mathematical operations and notations. Participants explore the clarity of the proof, its notation, and the validity of certain assertions made within it.
Discussion Character
- Exploratory
- Technical explanation
- Debate/contested
- Mathematical reasoning
Main Points Raised
- One participant describes the proof as simple, requiring only basic knowledge of binomial expansion and Fermat's Little Theorem, but notes the challenge lies in managing the notation.
- Several participants express difficulty in understanding the notation used in the proof, particularly regarding terms like a1^10 and the implications of digits in negative numbers.
- A participant provides a counterexample to a claim made in the proof, questioning the validity of an assertion regarding the last digit of a + b - c being zero.
- Another participant discusses the implications of writing numbers in different bases, specifically base 13, and how it affects the proof's assertions.
- Concerns are raised about the lack of justification for certain statements in the proof, with calls for clearer explanations and proofs of assertions made.
- One participant references historical examples of mathematical submissions to highlight the challenges of communication in mathematics.
- Another participant questions the necessity of the base in the proof and its impact on the fundamental properties being discussed.
- There is mention of the proof being presented to a group of mathematicians, but no feedback has been received, leading to speculation about the clarity and accessibility of the proof.
Areas of Agreement / Disagreement
Participants generally agree that the proof is difficult to read and that not all statements are justified. However, there is no consensus on the validity of the proof itself, as multiple competing views and counterexamples are presented.
Contextual Notes
Participants highlight limitations in the proof's notation and the need for clearer definitions and justifications for certain mathematical claims. There are unresolved questions regarding the assumptions made in the proof and the implications of using different numerical bases.
Who May Find This Useful
Readers interested in number theory, mathematical proofs, and the history of mathematical communication may find this discussion relevant.
Similar threads
Insights
Fermat's Last Theorem
- · Replies 105 ·
- · Replies 15 ·
- · Replies 2 ·
- · Replies 3 ·
- · Replies 1 ·
- · Replies 1 ·
High School
Fermat's Last Theorem; unacceptable proof, why?
- · Replies 12 ·
- · Replies 26 ·
- · Replies 2 ·
- · Replies 23 ·